Geopolitics Magazine special edition 2016 | Page 53

Other scientists claim that even if there is no free will for all human actions or even if free will, there
are only by convention these should not change the direction that would perceive and process the
notion of liberal volition. At least not until we will see something that will do the same parables moral
arguably regarding the scientific accuracy or more efficiently regarding sociopolitical and psychological
function. For this analysis to hold we need to keep reminded that fundamental everyday notions like
the arrow of time is just contractions of our imagination to recognize the facts and functions of the
universe.
Even though no one can no one can acknowledge That beyond any doubt that free will exists, some
neuroscientists of person we use the ability of free will to explain they have explained Unexpected
developments of life and destruction. Why and how, where severe brain damage Is occurred after
accidents, brain strokes and causes of brain disease dementia. The observed results So some people
even after serious brain trauma, are recovering and achieving a qualitative life while others with less
harsh injuries died with several days.
Neuroscience, Free Will and the Law
On that point are important implications of neuroscience on the sound interpretation of personal
responsibility, in the existence or nonexistence of free volition. We need to have in mind that the law is
there for the realization of moral context, right and wrong initially described in the established religion
believes and customs. Humans are social (political) beings and we pay significant attention to the
notion of free volition. Free will is the foundation base over responsibility, personal responsibility,
assessment liability, judgment responsibility. Responsibility it facilitates the organization of social
bonds, social synergies, and cooperation. To start with to have Free Will we need to have the
ownership and the importunity of our actions and to receive permission to take freely from a
consortium of material options.
Several judicial systems are discriminating among those offences that are result of intent (a.k.a free
will) and those without intent. In several states within USA murder a First Degree is punishable by
death, but there is a different approach when a homicide is the coming from a mental uncountable
person or a person under the influence of the psychoactive substances or " while the psyche was in
rush/boiled - raging mental momentum" (Justice 1951). Raging mental momentum is an extraordinary
state of the mind under which the control of the conscious mind limits to the subconscious mind
dictates an exceptional and graceful treatment in the court of law; On the one hand “unlawful killing
that is both willful and premeditated “ is punishable by life incarceration on the other hand homicide
in a momentum of mental range is punished by temporary incarceration 5-20 years (Iotropedia 2015).

Figure 5 Free will: We have ownership of our actions, we are the agents of our actions,
we have the permission to choose freely

Geopolitics.com.gr all rights reserved 2016

Page 52