Figure 1 . Image of the HAT-P-4 binary system . The two brightest stars in the field are HAT-P-4 A and its B companion ( lower left ). Their Hipparcos V magnitudes are 11.12 and 11.38 , respectively , and they lie 91.8 arcseconds apart .
G191 ) with an 8˚ x 8˚ field-of-view . In summary , we have three actors in the scene : a wide binary system with two very similar components , and a hot-Jupiter planet orbiting around the primary ( star A ).
Stars born at different times and locations in our Galaxy commonly present a different initial chemical composition due to the Galactic Chemical Evolution ( GCE ) effect , which leads to different chemical enrichment histories . On the other hand , it is generally assumed that individual components of wide binaries ( and most multiple systems ) have the same age and initial chemical composition , and formed coevally from a common molecular cloud .
This latter case is a strong advantage for comparative chemical studies , where GCE effects are greatly diminished or ruled-out ; in addition , the notable physical similarity between both components of a binary system makes it possible to achieve the highest possible precision in differential chemical studies when compared to classical ( i . e ., non-differential ) methods . Such precision is a requisite in order to detect even slight differences between both stars . That HAT-P-4 is not only a binary with physical similarities between its components , but also one that harbors a planetary companion , makes it an ideal case study on the possible chemical signature of the planet formation process in a binary star system . So far , this kind of challenging analysis has been performed in only a very few systems .
A high-precision chemical abundance study requires both high signal-to-noise ( S / N ) and high-resolution spectra . This fact , together with the relative brightness of both stars , made the combination of Gemini North with the Gemini Remote Access to CFHT ESPa- DOnS Spectrograph ( GRACES ) an excellent choice for the observation of this binary system . The stellar spectra were obtained under the Fast Turnaround observing mode ( program ID : GN-2016A-FT-25 ; with the author as the Principal Investigator ). We acquired the observations using the 1-fiber ( object-only ) observing mode , which provides a maximum resolving power of ~ 67,500 between 4,000 and 10,000 Ångstroms ( Å ). The exposure times were 2 x 16 minutes and 2 x 18 minutes for the stars A and B , respectively , obtaining a final S / N ~ 400 measured at ~ 6,000 Å in the combined spectra of each target .
A Surprising Chemical Difference Between Sibling Stars
We took advantage of the physical similarity between both stars and applied a lineby-line full differential technique in order to determine fundamental parameters and detailed chemical abundances . To do so , we used the FUNDPAR program ( Saffe , 2011 ) together with ATLAS9 model atmospheres . The results showed mainly three unexpected differences in the chemical pattern of both stars . First , the exoplanet host A star is ~ 0.1 dex more metal-rich than its stellar companion . This difference is remarkable and much higher than most metallicity differences found in similar binary systems ( see , e . g ., Desidera et al ., 2006 ). Second , star A shows a clear enhancement in its photo-
4 GeminiFocus October 2017
G191) with an 8˚ x 8˚ field-of-view. In sum-
mary, we have three actors in the scene: a
wide binary system with two very similar
components, and a hot-Jupiter planet orbit-
ing around the primary (star A).
Figure 1.
Image of the HAT-P-4
binary system. The two
brightest stars in the
field are HAT-P-4 A and
its B companion (lower
left). Their Hipparcos V
magnitudes are 11.12
and 11.38, respectively,
and they lie 91.8
arcseconds apart.
Stars born at different times and locations
in our Galaxy commonly present a different
initial chemical composition due to the Ga-
lactic Chemical Evolution (GCE) effect, which
leads to different chemical enrichment his-
tories. On the other hand, it is generally as-
sumed that individual components of wide
binaries (and most multiple systems) have
the same age and initial chemical composi-
tion, and formed coevally from a common
molecular cloud.
This latter case is a strong advantage for
comparative chemical studies, where GCE
effects are greatly diminished or ruled-out;
in addition, the notable physical similarity
between both components of a binary sys-
tem makes it possible to achieve the high-
est possible precision in differential chemi-
cal studies when compared to classical (i.e.,
non-differential) methods. Such precision is
a requisite in order to detect even slight dif-
ferences between both stars. That HAT-P-4
is not only a binary with physical similarities
between its components, but also one that
4
GeminiFocus
harbors a planetary companion, makes it an
ideal case study on the possible chemical
signature of the planet formation process in
a binary star system. So far, this kind of chal-
lenging analysis has been performed in only
a very few systems.
A high-precision chemical abundance study
requires both high signal-to-noise (S/N) and
high-resolution spectra. This fact, together
with the relative brightness of both stars,
made the combination of Gemini North with
the Gemini Remote Access to CFHT ESPa-
DOnS Spectrograph (GRACES) an excellent
choice for the observation of this binary sys-
tem. The stellar spectra were obtained under
the Fast Turnaround observing mode (pro-
gram ID: GN-2016A-FT-25; with the author as
the Principal Investigator). We acquired the
observations using the 1-fiber (object-only)
observing mode, which provides a maximum
resolving power of ~67,500 between 4,000
and 10,000 Ångstroms (Å). The exposure
times were 2 x 16 minutes and 2 x 18 minutes
for the stars A and B, respectively, obtaining
a final S/N ~ 400 measured at ~6,000 Å in the
combined spectra of each target.
A Surprising Che ֖6FffW&V6P&WGvVV6&Ɩr7F'0vRFGfFvRbFR666֖"ЦG&WGvVV&F7F'2BƖVBƖRЦ'ƖRgVFffW&VFFV6VR&FW FFWFW&֖RgVFVF&WFW'2@FWFVB6V֖6'VF6W2FF6vPW6VBFReTE"&w&6ffR#FvWFW"vFD3FVF7W&W2FR&W7VG26vVBǒF&VRVWV7BЦVBFffW&V6W2FR6V֖6GFW&`&F7F'2f'7BFRWWB7B7F 2FW&RWF&6FG27FV 6F2FffW&V6R2&V&&PBV6vW"F7BWFƖ6GFbЦfW&V6W2fVB6֖"&'77FV06VRRrFW6FW&WB#b6V6B7F 6w26V"V6VVBG2FФ7F&W"#