GeminiFocus July 2019 | Page 13

Accounting for the detection sensitivity curves and com- bining their results with those from radial velocity studies (sensitive to companions at smaller radii), the team con- cluded that the most likely location for giant planets to occur is between 1 and 10 au from their host stars. The oc- currence rate drops steeply at larger separations. The number of giant planets also declines significantly with increasing planetary mass. Although brown dwarfs are often consid- ered transitional objects between planets and stars, they appear to have quite different demographics than giant planets, as shown in Figure 3. The study concludes that only about one in ten stars hosts a brown dwarf companion at separations of 10 to 100 au. This is a factor of ten below the inferred oc- currence rate of giant planets around high- mass stars. Moreover, although the numbers are low, the distributions in both mass and semi-major axis are consistent with being flat for brown dwarfs, in contrast with the falling distributions for giant planets. In ad- dition, the detected brown dwarfs all orbit stars with masses below 1.5 M B , again unlike the giant planets. Based on these results, earlier suggestions that wide-separation giant planets and brown dwarfs may comprise a single under- lying population is unlikely to be correct. The divergent trends strongly indicate dis- parate formation mechanisms. Specifically, the study concludes that giant planets likely form “bottom up” through the process of core accretion while brown dwarfs form “top down” like stars via gravitational instabil- ity. More data are needed to confirm these trends; fortunately, there are another 231 stars from the rest of the GPIES survey await- ing final analysis and publication. July 2019 Spatially Resolved Kinematics of 20 MASSIVE Ellipticals Every galaxy has its own story, and every gal- axy has been many others in the past (un- like in the human parallel, this is not purely metaphorical, as galaxies grow via hierarchi- cal assembly). Generally speaking, the most massive galaxies have led the most interest- ing lives. These often reside in dense envi- rons that have exposed them to frequent interactions with assorted neighbors, influ- encing in complex ways the coevolution of their component stars, gas, dark matter, and supermassive black holes. Although the detailed formation histories of most galaxies will remain forever uncertain, the key thematic elements may be surmised through a variety of methods. A particularly powerful probe of a galaxy’s dynamical struc- ture is integral field spectroscopy (IFS). Wide- field IFS studies provide insight into global dynamics and past interactions, while IFS data on the innermost regions can constrain the central supermassive black hole (SMBH) mass and the shapes of the stellar orbits in the vicinity of its sphere of influence. The MASSIVE Galaxy Survey is systemati- cally targeting all early-type galaxies in the northern hemisphere with stellar masses greater than 3 × 10 11 M B within a distance of about 100 megaparsecs for detailed ki- nematic and photometric analysis. The lat- GeminiFocus Figure 3. GPIES sensitivity contours for companion mass (in units of Jupiter masses) and orbital semi-major axis (astronomical units) for planetary (left) and brown dwarf (right) com- panions. The six giant planets and three brown dwarfs detected in the survey are overlaid on the contours. Although the majority of these companions were not discovered by GPIES, their host stars were part of the unbiased sample and were not selected because of the pres- ence of the companions; thus, the detections are included in the statistical analysis. The curves indi- cate the numbers of stars in the sample for which the sensitivity allowed detection of compan- ions with the plotted combinations of param- eters; very few stars had sensitivity sufficient to detect planets of masses < 3 M Jup  , but two were detected. [Figure reproduced from Nielsen et al., The Astro- nomical Journal, 158: 13, 2019.] 11