GeminiFocus 2019 Year in Review | Page 41

Figure 13. Example distributions of the first four kinemati- cal moments (v, σ, h 3 and h 4  ) measured from the GMOS-N IFS data for two of the MASSIVE survey galaxies. For each galaxy, the top row shows two-dimensional maps, while the bottom row shows two-sided radial profiles from GMOS (magenta circles) and Mitchell (green squares) data. The verti- cal dotted lines mark radii of ± 0.2 arcsecond. Figure reproduced from Ene et al., The Astro- physical Journal, 878: 57, 2019. The kinematic diversity across the full sample is illustrated in Figure 14 (next page), which shows the velocity dispersion profiles for all 20 galaxies. Although most of the galaxies have centrally rising dispersions, the slopes vary greatly, and in some cases change sign with radius. A sharply rising central disper- sion may indicate the presence of a SMBH but can also reflect increasing radial anisot- ropy in the stellar velocities. Information January 2020 / 2019 Year in Review from the higher order moments, particularly the kurtosis h 4  , can determine the relative importance of these two effects. For this purpose, high spatial resolution for resolv- ing stellar kinematics within the sphere of influence of the SMBH is essential. As a proof of concept, the new study per- forms detailed dynamical modeling of the combined GMOS and Mitchell IFS data sets for NGC 1453, the most regular fast-rotating GeminiFocus 39