Gauteng Smallholder February 2016 | Page 3

GAUTENG COMMENT, by Pete Bower MAGAZINE HOW TO MAKE YOUR PLOT PROFITABLE Vol 17 No 2 February 2016 PUBLISHED BY Bowford Publications (Pty) Ltd Established 1985 (Reg No 2004/019727/07) PO Box 14648, Bredell 1623 Tel: 011 979-5088 or 076 176-7392 Fax: 086 602-3882 e-mail: [email protected] website: www.sasmallholder.co.za facebook.com/gautengsmallholder PUBLISHER & EDITOR Pete Bower RESEARCH EDITOR Vanessa Bower GRAPHIC DESIGN Michelle Urquhart ADVERTISEMENT SALES Call 011 979-5088 ADVERTISING RATES (All Rates Full Colour, incl VAT) Full Page - R7480 Half Page - R4620 Quarter P - R2570 1/8 page - R1360 Smaller sizes: R104 per col cm (Minimum size - 4 col cm) (Black only: colour rate less 20%) Booking discounts (Payment lumpsum in advance) 3 insertions - less 10% 6 insertions - less 15% (other payment and discount options are available) Circulation Area More than 19 000 copies distributed free through outlets in the Agricultural Smallholding settlements of Gauteng and adjoining provinces. Also available by mail and online. By Mail To receive the Smallholder by mail send us a supply of stamped, selfaddressed A4 envelopes. Or, subscribe for only R210 per year. See coupon in this edition. Online http://www.sasmallholder.co.za Copyright Title and contents protected by copyright. No part of this publication may be reproduced or stored in any form whatsoever without the prior written permission of the publisher. Disclaimer While every care is taken to ensure the accuracy of the information in this journal, neither the Editor nor the Publisher can be held responsible for damages or consequences of any errors or omissions. The Publisher does not stand warranty for the performance of any article or service mentioned in this journal, whether in an advertisement or elsewhere. FRONT COVER If you neglect to pick an artichoke at budding stage it turns into a beautiful mauve flower, not unlike an oversize Scotch Thistle. The epoch of man O bscured in the newspapers after New Year by the furore over racist utterances on social media by people who were clearly suffering bouts of brainfart was the announcement by scientists of the Anthropocene Epoch, or the epoch of man. This, they tell us, started in the middle of the 20th Century when Russia, the US and others started fiddling around with atom bombs, and when industry started to invent modern materials such as plastics and carbon fibre, and use metals such as titanium and aluminium in manufacturing. An epoch is measured by future generations by examining samples of sedimentary deposits laid down over the years. In the case of the Anthropocene Epoch, future analysts will notice the sediments being laid down now will contain high levels of radioactive isotopes, and high levels of carbon associated with the burning of fossil fuels, manufacture of plastics, use of chemicals etc. Whether the announcement of the Anthropocene Epoch is a good thing or a bad thing is open for discussion. One thing is for certain however: it's a pretty solid observation on what happens to a planet when you stock it with seven billion inventive people hellbent on consuming as much of its resources as they can. Something else happened over the holiday period which is potentially related to the Anthropocene Epoch, namely the COP21 meeting in Paris at which the world’s governments (South Africa included) pledged to reduce carbon emissions. Whether most of the signatories to the COP21 resolution actually believe their countries will meet those targets is another matter. In South Africa, for example, the cost of fitting out Eskom's existing coal-fired power stations with the kit necessary to reduce their emission levels is prohibitively expensive so it's unlikely we will ever meet our COP21 obligations. Regardless of how cynical signatories to COP21 were, the conference achieved one notable thing, namely an increasing awareness among ordinary citizens of the need to do SOMETHING to slow down global warming etc. And the reality is that much of what needs to be done will have to be done at an individual or household level. At an individual level, of course, is one's right to vote. At any election, voters should (and, we believe, will) start to support candidates or parties that espouse green-ness in the most vigorous way. From the parties' and candidates' side, winners will be those who develop and announce the best-thought-out green policies, and not merely a lot of vague platitudes and hot air. Candidates who, for example, push through the laws necessary to enable households to sell their surplus solar-generated electricity back into the grid (as happens in Germany and elsewhere) will get our vote. For only when that sort of initiative happens will it become truly enticing for ordinary households to invest in solar panels, batteries and inverters, the costs of which will drop dramatically as a result. But there's another observation which the green lobby often overlooks. It's no use talking about “cutting down” on the use of fossil fuels etc when, firstly, more than half of the world's population lives below the breadline in horrible poverty and secondly we're adding humans to the population at an exponential rate. People naturally want to consume more, not less, as they rise out of the poverty trap by dint of their own hard work or because they are lifted out by some socia [