FUTURE TALENT March-May 2019 | Page 56

O ON TOPIC That might well be true: a 2017 Japanese study found an increased risk of depression in those working longer hours, but no correlation when the work was felt to be inherently meaningful and satisfying. However, while Musk’s reassurance might be well received by hard-charging entrepreneurial types, it won’t necessarily help the 37% of UK workers who describe their current job as “meaningless”, as reported by YouGov. ne of the most commonly acknowledged problems with long working hours is that it crowds out any space for truly creative thought. Many advocates of a four-day week note that we have shifted to a knowledge economy but retained the working hours and practices of a former industrial age. When it comes to knowledge work, a valuable insight could well come to one employee while relaxing in the bath on their day off, while their more diligent colleague agonises at their desk, fruitlessly, for weeks. That doesn’t seem fair. But it does seem to be the case, at least in some instances. Google, while not going as far as introducing a four-day week, is famous for allowing its engineers to spend one day each week freely exploring their own ideas, in any manner they like. Without the company enabling this additional headspace and time for unhurried reflection, there would have been no Google Earth, Gmail O nians abylo n-day B e ve Th the t a se inven based on , week planets. n seve 92 BC 56 // Future Talent Miserable people do miserable work, and long-hours cultures breed misery or AdSense, all of which were developed as ad hoc projects. As Sandra Comas, professor at IE Business School, comments, “the correlation is becoming clearer... Shorter work hours can lead to greater thinking and reflection, opportunity to ‘connect the dots‘, and clarity to see the dots in the first place.” Automation is another factor to throw into the mix. It’s estimated that, by 2020, 30% of all jobs in the UK have the potential to be done by machines. Some organisations, such as the TUC, believe the benefits of the efficiencies these new technologies bring should be shared fairly across the working population, via a national four-day week. Suggestions like this have been cropping up regularly since 1930, when the British economist JM Keynes predicted that, due to the increasing efficiencies of automation, we would all be working around 15 hours a week by this point. Roberts notes that introducing change through legislation, as the TUC suggests, would itself prove difficult. “You’d need a government brave enough to bring it in, and with the resources to check it’s happening,” she says. “For that to happen would require a seismic sea change.” However, even legislation to formalise the five-day week faced a large number of similar objections. An official four-day week is now an option being actively investigated by the Labour Party and is already official policy for the Green Party. eanwhile, large organisations are beginning to explore the option of a shorter working week. For example, biomedical research charity The Wellcome Trust is currently considering whether to introduce a four-day week for its 800 staff based in central London. And last year, Amazon piloted a small programme where some staff M a trials iefly est. r b c f r bli day o Repu ench with one r F e Th eek ay w 10-d 7 4 8 1 1793 6 9 4 1 ders a VII or Henry m 14-hour u maxim for field ay d k r wo rers. labou 1815 our Ten-h f the . o n UK datio Foun ent in the m e v o M d en an d Wom n grante g re in child ur work ho t - r 0 o 1 h a s nd a ys. day a Saturda n o day