Forensics Journal - Stevenson University 2010 | Page 25

FORENSICS JOURNAL psychopath to maintain. They are successful because they constantly tailor their façade to their immediate targets, winning over their targets’ trust through lies (Babiak, 2008, p. 1). The second main trait is emotional poverty. Other than anger and frustration, psychopaths lack empathy, sympathy or remorse. They refuse to accept responsibility for their own actions, and blame others for anything that goes wrong. The closest they come to normal human emotions is by mimicking them to manipulate their targets (Babiak, 2008, p. 1). The third main trait characterizes the psychopath’s daily life, which is irresponsible, impulsive, and lavish. Although their resumes are full of successes and achievements, their real life is the complete opposite. They are easily bored by details and often neglect important work. In fact, they lack goals and do not extend themselves to achieve anything of significance. They act without thinking of, or caring about, the consequences of their actions on others. Although they are unwilling to achieve success on their own, they are more than willing to take credit for someone else’s (Babiak, 2008, p. 2). The final main trait of psychopaths is a history of antisocial behavior, including fraud in adulthood. This antisocial behavior is often the result of the interaction and culmination of the other main traits of psychopaths. Their emotional poverty and impulsive life create a belief system that enables them to take what they want, when they want, without remorse, guilt or fear, leading to a life of crime (Babiak, 2008, p. 2). JUSTICE FOR SOME BUT NOT FOR ALL A common complaint heard from those who investigate fraud is that there is not enough done to punish occupational fraud and other white-collar offenders. According to the ACFE’s 2006 Report to the Nation on Occupational Fraud and Abuse, the most common employment action taken against alleged offenders was termination, followed by restitution. While nearly three-quarters of the cases surveyed were reported to the police, frauds with lower median losses were less likely to be reported. Of the cases that were prosecuted, the most common result was a “guilty” or “no contest” plea. Even withstanding prosecution, the main goal of an organization which has become a victim of fraud is to seek restitution. Unfortunately, nearly half never see a dime (Wells, 2008, pp. 40-44). Regardless of what surveys tell us, an expectation gap exists between what the public feels is justic