Food & Drink Process & Packaging Issue 23 2019 | Page 20

How to... reduce plastic packaging wall thickness by 25% using injection compression moulding Sumitomo (SHI) Demag’s UK packaging expert Kevin Heap talks through the commercial and ecological benefits of injection compression moulding and how the technique compares to traditional moulding of ultra-thin plastic packaging. What is injection compression moulding? Why is it beneficial to packaging? Global forecasts for rigid plastics, which is the category thin walled containers sits in, is predicted to rise at an annual rate of 3.7% from 52.9 million tonnes in 2017 to 63.4 million tonnes in 2022, according to research by Smithers Pira*. The value of materials used to produce The method of pressing material in a rigid plastic packaging is also forecast to mould is quite a common industrial grow across the same period at an annual process, typically using rubber and resin rate of 3.9% to reach $202 billion. and a combination of heat and pressure to mould products. PE is projected to be the largest- growing segment during this forecast It has generally been used to produce period. Light-weighting and consumer thicker sectioned parts on slower convenience are important factors in cycle times, for example, optical lens this expansion, with the combination or thermoset applications. However, of environmental pressures and high the technique hasn’t been applied to polymer prices placing increasing the mass-production of polypropylene pressures on packaging manufacturers.- packaging applications, until recently. 20 FDPP - www.fdpp.co.uk Most companies operating in the competitive arena produce millions of packaging containers every year. Volume, raw material waste and precision are fundamental to each company’s financial viability, with many facilities operating 20+ machines to meet supplier demand. By applying injection compression techniques to stack moulds, packaging moulders can now reduce the wall thickness of containers and lids from 0.45mm to 0.35mm. This saves around 25% in raw polypropylene materials compared to the standard injection moulding process, while maintaining comparable mechanical properties. Given the dominant role that materials play in low cost, mass-produced disposable food packaging containers and with packaging converters striving