Food & Drink Process & Packaging Issue 21 2018 | Page 16

space usually favours metal detection, as do applications where the speed of the product passing through the machine is very fast or very slow. Maintaining a reliable performance over time demands periodic calibration and validation checks on both types of technology. In some cases, the process can halt production several times each shift. Users may therefore want to reduce the frequency, but they need to bear in mind that the longer the interval, the more product may have to be discarded or recalled if a problem with the inspection system is discovered. While a well-maintained x-ray system Metal detectors can identify all types of Unlike ferrous metals, stainless steel is metal based on magnetic and conductive usually non-magnetic and a poor electrical properties, while an x-ray system conductor. depends on density differentials. This means that an x-ray system may struggle Consequently, a stainless steel swarf, to detect aluminium, including foil or metal shard or narrow wire hidden in a dry metallised film. Equally, foil packaging can product typically needs to be 50% larger present a challenge for metal detectors, which can only detect magnetic or ferrous metal contamination inside the package, while to some extent an x-ray system can than a ferrous sphere to generate a similar signal size. This disparity can rise to 300% in wet products, such as ready meals, meat, fish, sauces, preserves and bread, detect all metals. because moisture acts as a conductive Orientation effect occurs if a contaminant swamped by product effect. Solutions, is non-spherical, such as a piece of wire, in which case the ability to spot it may depend on the orientation it presents to the detector. In the case of x-rays, the presenting face must be equal to or greater in size than the base resolution of the detector diodes, which is analogous to the pixel resolution in a camera. Metal and the metal detection signal can be such as simultaneous multi-frequency, are now available on the market to address this longstanding issue. Both product density and how uniform it is can affect the sensitivity of an x-ray. THINK ABOUT PRACTICALITIES detectors are certainly not immune to the The physical size of machinery is a major orientation effect, but they do not have consideration, driven in part by rising this absolute cut-off. Product effect may be produced by the product itself or by its packaging. Until recently, anything wet or conductive impacted the performance of metal detectors, especially in the case of stainless steel contaminants. This is because metal detectors work by spotting materials that create a magnetic or electrical disturbance as they pass through an electromagnetic field. 16 FDPP - www.fdpp.co.uk prices of industrial real estate. Limited presents a minimal hazard, some systems require protective lead curtains to contain the x-rays. These in turn need condition monitoring and must not come into contact with unpackaged product. Care must also be taken that they don’t impede the passage of lightweight products through the system. Summing up, Phil comments: “It can be quite easy to overthink the options. In some applications, it is obvious which type of inspection technology to go for, since only one of them can reliably detect the contaminants that pose the risk you are trying to mitigate. As food factories strive to curtail rising food prices through widespread adoption of automation and sourcing ingredients through different suppliers, the risks increase incrementally. Installing a metal detection system is the first line of defence, with today’s technology on a par with, if not better than, most x-ray features.” www.fortresstechnology.com