Fish Sniffer On Demand Digital Edition Issue 3615 July 7-21 2017 | Page 5

COVER STORY
... Ask Brooke ! brooke @ fishsniffer . com
VOL . 36 • ISS . 15

Hey Dan ! — Letters To The Editor

What ’ s on your mind ? Do you have something you ’ d like to share with us and our readers ? A picture ... a story ... a question to ask , or an answer to another ?
Let ’ s hear your compliments , or your gripes ! Whatever it is , send it to : HEY , DAN !, c / o Fish Sniffer Publications , The Fish Sniffer - P . O . Box 776 , Colfax , CA 95713 , or you can now e-mail it at danielbacher @ fishsniffer . com . Please enclose a self-addressed , stamped envelope for the return of pictures or text . Thanks !
Why Is Delta Independent Science Board Defending California WaterFix ?
Hey Dan ! I decided to get out a short letter moments ago to the Delta Independent Science Board about their awful WaterFix EIR / S review . Below is the letter .
E . Robert Wright , Senior Counsel . Friends of the River
June 14 , 2017 Delta Independent Science Board Members via Email
Re : URGENT Delta Independent Science Board public review draft , Final EIR / EIS for California WaterFix
Dear Delta Independent Science Board Members :
This follows up some brief comments we made at your teleconference meeting two days ago about your public review draft of your review of the Final EIR / EIS for the California WaterFix Delta Water Tunnels project . First , we were surprised that the content and tone of your public review draft is oriented to defending the Final EIR / EIS instead of addressing such serious deficiencies as the complete failure of the EIR / EIS to include any alternatives finally beginning to restore through-Delta flows by reducing exports . The draft actually includes language in the last paragraph ( at p . 14 ) stating :
These comments should not be taken as criticism of those who have assembled the information , carried out the analyses , and prepared the BDCP and WaterFix environmental documents . They followed what the laws , regulations , and permitting processes require . They faced enormous challenges from such a large and complex system . ( Emphasis added ).
In fact , there have been numerous comments by respected public interest organizations over the years about significant and profound violations of NEPA and CEQA permeating the project environmental documents . Being neither judges nor lawyers , opining that the environmental documents comply with law is not something that you are qualified to do . Many lawyers have concluded that the environmental documents do not comply with NEPA or CEQA and have sostated in formal comments . That inappropriate conclusion should be deleted from your review .
Second , the last two pages of your review in addition to including the above language , includes a whole section ( at pp . 12-14 ): “ Reflections : Paralysis by Analysis , and an Opportunity missed .” This section includes the language ( at p . 13 ) stating :
In our judgment , what the Courts now require to be included in an EIS / EIR can make them so massive as to be incomprehensible . . . Until legislatures amend NEPA and CEQA and
11844 Atwood Rd • Auburn 530-888-7825
set a new course , we recommend that the agencies prepare a separate document for each project laying out the critical issues for public and scientific review . ( Emphasis added ).
The new Administration and Congress would no doubt appreciate very much language from independent scientists blaming court decisions enforcing our laws for the length and other problems with some environmental impact statements and reports . In fact , most experienced environmental lawyers and judges who handle these cases would , I believe , explain to you that it is the continuing efforts by some public agencies in some situations to fail to make the environmental full disclosure required by NEPA and CEQA that leads to decisions determining that certain environmental documents fail to comply with law . Another ongoing problem is refusal by some public agencies in some instances , like the BDCP / WaterFix , to include development of real alternatives to projects outof concern that the public would end up favoring such alternatives over the project that the agency and / or its masters wish to carry out .
This entire section needs to either be deleted or drastically modified , unless it really is your intent to assist efforts to weaken NEPA and CEQA . In the current political climate , the very last thing we need is “ amendments ” of NEPA and CEQA .
~ Sincerely , E . Robert Wright , Senior Counse , Friends of the River
Hey Bob ! You wrote a superb letter ! Many public trust advocates fear that under pressure from the water contractors and Jerry Brown administration , the “ independent scientists ” may be following the dictates of political “ science ” rather than real science and cave into defending this massive water project , considered by many to be the most environmentally destructive public works project in California history . The Delta Tunnels project is based on the absurd contention that diverting more water from the Sacramento River for use by corporate agribusiness interests and Southern California water agencies will somehow result in the “ restoration ” of the San Francisco Bay-Delta Estuary . Thanks for all of the work that you do defending the Delta , our rivers and our imperiled fisheries !
~ Dan

TRAILER HITCHES

• Professionally Installed
• Custom Fit
• Same Day Service
645 Pacific St • Rocklin 916-773-7333

COVER STORY

Jack Naves pulled out all the stops and no species was safe when he fished the recent Kokanee Power Derby at Lake Pardee . Kokanee were Jack ’ s target , but that didn ’ t stop him from landing a big rainbow and a bigger channel cat . The channel cat jumped all over a blue kokanee spinner . While Lake Pardee is best known for its outstanding bass , trout and kokanee fishing , the catfish action can be great too . Traditional baits like mackerel and nightcrawlers fished early and late in the day produce results , but the best baits are kokanee or trout entrails .
Photo by GINA NAVES , Fish Sniffer Staff .
... SUBSCRIPTION QUESTION ?

... Ask Brooke ! brooke @ fishsniffer . com

ADDRESS CHANGE FORM
MOVING OR MOVED ?
Send us your new address so we can get your
FISH SNIFFER publications coming
to your proper address ... ON TIME , EVERY TIME !
Name __________________________________ OLD Address ____________________________ City , State , ZIP ___________________________ NEW Address ____________________________ City , State , ZIP ___________________________
Send To : THE FISH SNIFFER
P . O . Box 776 , Colfax , CA 95713 Or Call Toll-Free 1-800-748-6599
Save Time And Errors ... Attach Your Mailing Label !
July 7 - 21 , 2017
5
“ The No . 1 Newspaper Dedicated Entirely To Northern California Sportsmen !”
Published By NORTHERN CALIFORNIA ANGLER PUBLICATIONS , INC .
The Fish Sniffer P . O . Box 776 , Colfax , CA 95713 Toll-Free ( 800 ) 748-6599 www . fishsniffer . com
CAL KELLOGG ’ S E-MAIL : calkellogg @. fishsniffer . com EDITORIAL E-MAIL : danielbacher @. fishsniffer . com
Established 1982
CALIFORNIA-NEVADA EDITION
FOUNDERS Harold A . ( Hal ) Bonslett ( 1937-2000 ) Winnie A . Bonslett
ADMINISTRATION Paul Kneeland .................................... Publisher Daniel Bacher ..... Editor / Conservation Director Cal Kellogg ........... Editor / Media Development
ADVERTISING / MARKETING Paul Kneeland ................. Advertising Director Sheldon Bright ............. Advertising / Marketing Ernie Marlan ......................... Advertising Sales Kit McNear ........................... Advertising Sales
PRODUCTION Cal Kellogg ................... Director of Production Wes Ward ........................................ Webmaster
GENERAL OFFICE Brooke Cyphers .......... Administrative Director Daniel Bacher ... Conservation , Special Features Paulette Kenyon ............................ Food Editor
SPECIAL FEATURES EDITORS Steve Lau , Kathie Morgan , Bill Kremeres , Bill Adelman , Dave Hurley , Jack Naves , Roland Aspiras , Michael McNeilly ,
Alaska Editor : Captain Steve Smith
Graphic Design by Lorraine Innovative Publications 530 621-4053 Printing by Gold Country Printing Auburn , CA - ( 530 ) 852-0279
www . navionics . com
THE FISH SNIFFER is entered as periodical postage at Citrus Heights , CApost office and additional offices . Postmaster : Send address changes to THE FISH SNIFFER , The Fish Sniffer P . O . Box 776 , Colfax , CA 95713 , All rights reserved . THE FISH SNIFFER ( ISSN-0747-3397 ) is an independent outdoor newspaper published bi-weekly on Fridays twenty-six ( 26 ) times annually , by NORTHERN CALIFORNIA ANGLER PUBLICATIONS , INC ., The Fish Sniffer , P . O . Box 776 Colfax , CA 95713 .
The content of this publication are for the general information , convenience and entertainment of the reader . Neither Fish Sniffer nor any of its principals , staff or incidental damages , or inconvenience incurred or experienced , related to these contents , and do not warrant their accuracy or reliability .
SUBSCRIPTION RATES One Year ( 26 )..........................................$ 40.00 Counter Price ( Single Issue )*...................$ 2.75
* CA Sales Tax on Retail Sales Only
Note : subscriptions paid in advance are non-cancellable , and not subject to refund , but may be transfered upon request .
ADVERTISING INFORMATION Address all advertising inquires to Advertising Department , THE FISH SNIFFER , The Fish Sniffer , P . O . Box 776 , Colfax , CA 95713 . Tel . toll-free ( 800 ) 748- 6599 weekdays 8AM-5PM , or leave message 24 hours . Rates and other information available on request .
IT PAYS TO ADVERTISE IN THE FISH SNIFFER ... We Reach SPORTSMENT !
Contact these reps for information : Sheldon Bright .................( 916 ) 714-4538 Ernie Marlan .....................( 916 ) 204-7373