Firestopping Book Firestopping Book | Page 104

Also common are “top of wall” or “head of wall” joints. While fire- resistance-rated wall and floor assemblies are tested as assemblies using the ASTM E 119 or the UL 263 test standards, neither of those tests evaluates the performance at the point where the wall and horizontal assembly connect. To illustrate this, consider the continuity provisions for a fire barrier in Section 707.5 which require the fire barrier to extend to the underside of the floor or roof deck above and that joints and voids at the intersection of the two systems comply with Sections 707.8 and 707.9. The photo shown in Figure 104 illustrates a situation where a fire barrier extends to a corrugated metal deck, creating voids over the top of the wall. If these voids are not protected with a top-of-wall joint system, they provide a direct path for a fire to spread to the unexposed side of the wall and therefore negate the intent and purpose of the wall. The photo in Figure 105 shows the installation of another type of joint system at the top of the wall. Without properly protecting these breeches or intersections with fire-resistant joint systems, the effectiveness of the fire-resistance-rated wall will clearly have been compromised. CODES & STANDARDS In the current version of NBC 2016, it doesn’t give any specific application requirement for joints. However, it presents a clear definition of joints in clause 2.32, note 2 of Part 4 as below: “Fire stop assembly for joints is the one where fire stop with movement capability is used to seal the linear joints between adjacent fire separating elements, to maintain the fire resistance of the separating elements, which should be installed within its tested design limits with regard to size of the joint, type of assembly, and anticipated compression and extension of the joint.”