FEAS Yearbook FEAS Yearbook 2011 | Page 58

FEDERATION OF EURO-ASIAN STOCK EXCHANGES ANNUAL REPORT APRIL 2011 BULGARIAN STOCK EXCHANGE ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL DEVELOPMENTS As the IMF point out, the current recession was preceded by an investment boom in construction, real estate and the associated financial sectors. Now that the boom (which was always unsustainable, Bulgaria's current account deficit in 2007 hit almost 27% of GDP) is well and truly over in these sectors, the strong associated decline in investment could have large negative effects on output. Moreover, it will take considerable time before the excess labor and resources that are no longer needed in these sectors can be absorbed by other sectors, which suggests that the rate of unemployment may rise yet further and remain higher for some considerable time. Recent changes in pension system parameters and contribution rates have also put significant pressure on Bulgaria's pension finances. During the years 2003 to 2007 total revenue surged by about 51 percent and Bulgaria experienced the strongest rise in its revenue-to-GDP ratio among the new EU member states (about 4.5 percent of GDP). Following several years of strong increases (around 6% a year) Bulgarian growth declined sharply in 2009 when the economy was hit hard by credit squeeze which formed part of the global economic and financial crisis. As a result budget financing of the pension system has risen sharply during the recession. Before 2008 budget transfers to close the financing gap of the pension fund had averaged about 3 percent of GDP. This increased to about 5 percent of GDP in 2009 and for 2010 the budget anticipates a transfer of more than 6 percent of GDP. And if there is not a sharp rebound in domestic consumption (which in all probability there won't be) these shortfalls become structural, not cyclical, and solutions will need to be found. Capital inflows, which had been keeping the current account deficit afloat, dropped from a peak of 44 percent of GDP in 2007 to less than 10 percent of GDP in 2009. As a result, investment, which had risen by over 20 percent annually during the previous two years, fell by nearly 30%. And as the investment flows dried up, the Current Account deficit closed rapidly, as imports (and domestic consumption) dropped back sharply. Employment also started to fall, while the unemployment rate rose rapidly, hitting a seasonally adjusted 9% in March and April this year, according to Eurostat seasonally adjusted data. This sudden increase in income encouraged the Bulgarian authorities to offset part of the additional revenue by lowering social security contributions. Rates were cut by 6 percentage points from 2002 to 2007 (for the pension and unemployment funds) and there was a further 2.4 percentage points reduction in 2009. Bulgaria does not publish seasonally adjusted quarter-on-quarter growth numbers, but given that the economy only shrank by 1.5% year- on-year (according to the flash estimate published by the statistics office on August 13), which was the lowest figure recorded since the country entered a recession in the first quarter of 2009 (and down from an annual drop of 5.9% in Q4 2009), the economy does at least seem to have stabilised. As for the details agriculture contributed to the improvement, with an increase of 1.6 per cent year-on-year, while the services and industrial sectors only declined by 1.7 per cent and 0.3 per cent, respectively. Private consumption, which was one of the main drivers of economic growth in earlier years, was down an annual 7.6 per cent for the quarter, while investment was 1.4 per cent lower. So there has been no real improvement in private consumption, nor should we expect to see any in the near term Despite an increase in exports (up 11.4% on the year) and continued decline of imports (down 1.2%), the trade gap for the second quarter was expected to be 4.2 per cent of GDP. As a result, the EU 2009–12 Convergence Programme is forecasting a steady decline in potential growth to an annual 0.3 percent in 2050, and this meagre growth is only obtained by assuming a - totally unrealistic (in what will then be such an old population) - labour participation rate of 70 percent. Personally, I think these numbers are way, way to optimistic, and all of this is badly in need of a current calibration based on what is already happening in ageing societies like Germany and Japan. Bulgaria's sustainable growth rate doesn't start to get affected in 2050, it is already on its way down now. Information obtained from the Exchange. BULGARIA EXTERNAL SECTOR INDICATORS Gross external debt, Euro million Gross External Debt (% GDP) Current Account (% of GDP) FDI (% of GDP) 2002 10,768,9 63.5 -2.4 5.8 2003 10,640,6 58.1 -5.3 10.1 2004 12,561,9 61.7 -6.4 13.4 2005 15,506,9 66.7 -11.6 13.6 2006 20,690,9 82.0 -17.6 23.5 2007 29,016,8 94.3 -25.2 29.4 2008 37,112,4 104.7 -23.0 19.0 2009 37,808,1 108.2 -8.9 6.9 2010 36,918,3 102.5 -1.0 4.5 2006 51,783 6.5 7.3 6.0 2007 60,185 6.4 8.4 9.6 2008 69,295 6.2 12.3 0.7 2009 68,322 -5.5 2.8 -18.3 2010 70,474 0.2 2.4 2.0 BULGARIA MACROECONOMIC INDICATORS Gross domestic product (million BGN) Gross domestic product (annual real growth rate, %) Consumer price index (average annual change, %) Industrial production index (annual change, %) Key Information Contacts Financial Supervision Commission www.fsc.bg Central Depository www.csd-bg.bg Bulgarian National Bank www.bnb.bg Invest Bulgaria Agency www.investbg.government.bg National Statistical Institute www.nsi.bg PAGE 56