Faith On The Line - Stress, Stress Go Away Vol 19 | Page 42

Phone Interview with Walter Veith April 14, 2013 Walter, what have you been doing in 2013 evangelistically? I have just returned from the Transvaal camp meeting which was attended by between twelve and thirteen thousand people. Subsequent to this we conducted an evangelistic series in a large Dutch Reform Church which was recently purchased by the Seventh-day Adventist Church and thus offered a unique opportunity to reach out to the community. These meetings were regularly attended by between 300 and 400 guests and we could share the great truths which people need to hear for the times we live in. Francois du Plessis is continuing with the meetings and it is our prayer that many will embrace the truth and take their stand on the Lord’s side. In March, a new Pope was elected who is a Jesuit. It is not being kept secret, but even publicly praised. What is the significance that the new Pope is a Jesuit? The new Pope is not only a Jesuit, which means that he is absolutely committed to ultramontanism, but he has been actively engaged in ‘Social Justice’ issues. His strong emphasis on the poor and marginalized means that the ‘Catholic Social Agenda’ is a high priority of his papacy. What exactly does this entail? Ultramontanism was the Jesuit catchphrase of the Council of Trent which cemented papal power and authority. The Vatican II agenda was to sell this Ultramontanism (all power in one man) under the guise of openness to the religious world in general and Protestantism in particular.  Again it was the Jesuits (under the leadership of Karl Rahner who incidentally worked together with Ratzinger and also trained Paul Knitter who wrote the book No 42 To Go d be the Glo 2 for H a m is a z in other Name?, which not only redefines salvation but opens the way for interreligious unity by reducing Christ’s role me ssa ge to that of other religious founders) who had to sell the new “openness” to the world. Vatican II did however not relinquish one iota of the papal claim to supremacy or its claim to being the sole avenue for salvation. Numerous blatant statements by the Foundation on Doctrine and Faith and even by the then Cardinal Ratzinger (Pope Benedict) confirm this fact.  The Pope emeritus, Benedict, leaves behind a Catholic Church that is accustomed to power and prestige. In the media, we see that the Papacy is more pervasive than ever. What, in your opinion, did Ratzinger accomplish during his tenure as Pope? Ratzinger continued the ecumenical agenda of his predecessor, and papal supremacy in the religious sphere has been virtually cemented through the various councils, agreements, charta’s and interreligious bodies that have been set up. There are many examples of Protestant and world religious leaders and bodies bowing to this supremacy and even of Protestant leaders such as Rowan Williams kissing the ring of the Pope although he is supposedly subject to the Queen of Britain. The Pope has increasingly become the universal spokesman for world religions in their quest to tackle social issues but what remains is ‘Universal Moral Supremacy’ which has to be set up.  Ratzinger set the stage through his UN and German Parliament speeches calling for natural law to be the basis for governing human morality (this of course being the basis of Catholic moral ethics and incidentally the very reason why they believe that they can modify Divine Law). He claimed that ‘natural law’ formed the basis of human rights which in turn include the right to work, rest and family association, all of which were cornerstones of Benedict‘s Papacy. Workers‘ rights must be guaranteed by the state so that corporate greed cannot and will not interfere with these rights. That is why Benedict called for economic regulatory bodies to ensure economic ethical values and why he emphasized the family as the cornerstone of human societ