Extraordinary And Plenipotentiary Diplomatist diplomatist vol-7 Issue -9 sep 2019 | Page 40

SPOTLIGHT AFGHANISTAN AND ONE HUNDRED YEARS OF INDEPENDENCE BY MOHAMMAD MUSA JAFARI* I ndependence for the Afghan people is still an unknown phenomenon. The leaders and people of Afghanistan have never felt a sense of pride in international relations due to the rapid changes from 1919 up to present time, numerous disasters caused by consecutive domestic crises and the disputed geopolitical position. Although Afghan government had taken top arrangements and spent a large amount of money for celebrating the 100th year Independence Day anniversary, a suicide bomb attack at a wedding in Kabul killed 80 people and wounded 300 and disrupted all the arrangements for a historic celebration and turned the celebration into a mourning one. But the important question is why has independence been so costly and challenging for Afghanistan? What do the Afghan people think and dream about their country’s 100th independence anniversary? To answer this question, we need to look at both domestic and international levels and study a century of Afghan independence from establishing domestic interactions to the impact of political and social elements on Afghanistan’s foreign relations. Afghanistan in the last century and after independence to the present day has experienced diff erent types of political systems including the monarchical system of government (1973-1919), the Mohammed Daoud Khan Republic (1978-1973), the Communist regimes (1992-1978), the Islamic Emirate (1993-2001) and democracy (after September 11th). This profound change in the political structure of a country alone can be attributed to the failure and continuation of state bankruptcy, especially as a series of coups, revolutions, civil wars, and ethnic confl icts have been an indispensable part of a century of Afghanistan’s independence. Hundreds of years ago, widespread poverty and illiteracy played a critical role in keeping Afghan people away from political and social participation, and even the progressivism of the rulers such as Amanullah Khan, who brought Afghanistan’s independence, did not have a signifi cant impact on society. The fall of Amanullah Khan’s government showed that even independence cannot guarantee survival. King Amanullah was intent to speed up modernization in a very short period of time in traditional Afghan society while issues such as modern government, citizenship, and political and social freedom had taken centuries to be institutionalized in the West. The rapid pace of change and the lack of solutions to social problems and community cohesion have led to continued dispersal and ethnic confl ict which are considered to be serious threats. Keeping people away from the process of political contribution has always been one of the main reasons for the rapid changes in Afghanistan’s internal system, and the Afghan rulers have always sought to impose their authority from top to bottom in the form of control and exercise of power. After September 11, 2001 and the formation of a new order, the fi rst experiences of a democratic system were achieved with the participation of the people. The US 40 • Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary Diplomatist • Vol 7 • Issue 9 • September 2019, Noida