Exhibition News January 2020 | Page 61

Tech What’s great about Native Apps? What about PWS? What about pricing? Is it worth it? Jose Bort, CEO at Eventscase points out that a Native App will offer an experience that has been calibrated for both Android and iOS users. Native Apps also work offline – ideal for venues with restricted or poor Wi-Fi access. Sebastien Jouhans, technology director of Genuine X at Jack Morton Worldwide explains that previously the argument of producing a Native App was that it worked offline, had push notifications and device hardware access and tended to work faster. Brecht Forneau, senior director EMEA & APAC Marketing at Aventri agrees and offers more insight. Native Apps also allow the organiser to capture valuable usage data that will inform them on the quality of their events. Did users make a lot of connections at your event? How did they navigate through your floorplan? What sessions did they attend and how long did they stay? These insights are valuable for organisers. But, it isn’t always an easy option according to Felix Allen Stroud co-founder at CrowdComms, as Apple is continually creating hurdles when it comes to app submission, thereby building the case for using PWS. It’s not surprising that organisers are making more use of Web Apps. The most recent web browsers support all these features of a Native App and more, according to Jouhans. Stroud-Allen explains that PWS frameworks are very advanced now and can match match core Native App functionality. Functions such as an off-line mode, push messages, geo location, Bluetooth connectivity via Web Bluetooth API’s are all possible now. In the future PWS functionality will include NFC connectivity, proximity sensor and fingerprint sensor functionality. Development of APIs that can be added to PWS platforms are continuing to be developed to allow greater functionality. The beauty is that nothing needs to be downloaded. Some technology companies have always taken this view that web as opposed to native offers less friction in the app usage transaction. Juraj Holub, head of communications at Slido says that since day one their vision has been that technology needs to be invisible to make events better. To minimise barriers of joining an event, they have built a web-based app, meaning participants don’t have to download or install anything. Over time, Slido has developed Native Apps for iOS and Android, but the Web App beats them almost 4:1 in terms of usage. All the experts saw this as the crucial decision making issue. Bort says prices do tend to vary, because certain providers will overcharge for what is now a common investment. In general, though, his company has found that competition between software providers has definitely brought the costs down. Between Web and Native Apps, we’re talking about a small difference in price but a big leap in quality for Native Apps. You can now build a fully branded, Native App for both Android and iOS users for around £1,500. But there are different types of pricing models. Most of the provider’s price on the number of attendees or offer an enterprise multi-event pricing model. Alternatively, some are based on a pay-per- use models, like Guidebook. Organisers don’t want to create an app that no-one is is going to use. Mortimer has had experience of having to drive app downloads. It becomes a marketing exercise all of its own. However, in his experience it’s not about the type of app, but more about the functionality of the app and how critical is it to improving attendee experience. Bort agrees about marketing an app, saying that the percentage of users will go up and down, but this could be attributed to external factors, like advertising. So it’s important to get the word out that there is an app and what the functions are. Marketing the usage of an app is crucial but Jouhans’ opinion is that people are always reluctant to download an app for a single day event which might last just a few hours. He always recommends to use a PWA first unless there is a compelling argument where they can be offered something of value through an app that cannot be done via the Web App. To conclude, the content within the app and the functionality it offers are going to impact adoption and engagement. Those factors, combined with the price and the download rates, are going to determine if an organiser has made the right choices. “Organisers don’t want to create an app that no- one’s going to use” January — 61