Euromedia February March | Page 8

News

News

Broadcasters resist EC Directive changes

A grouping of Europe ’ s commercial broadcasters has warned that proposed changes to the AVMS ( Audiovisual Media Services ) Directive are a step backwards that risks damaging growth , audience choice and investment in European content , instead of delivering the Commission ’ s stated aim of fostering Europe ’ s digital economy .

When the European Commission embarked on the current review , vice president Andrus Ansip pledged to enable audiovisual companies , “ to be the powerhouses in the digital economy , not weigh them down with unnecessary rules ”. But instead of deregulation , the broadcasters ’ grouping contends that the current proposals will increase restrictions - jeopardising investment in European content , increasing unfair competition with online players , and undermining the freedom to broadcast .
European broadcasters say they are already responsible for the majority of commercial investment in European content , pay significant taxes and provide highly regulated services that are subject to robust audience protections , particularly for minors . The review of the AVMS Directive is a once-in-a-decade opportunity to promote media plurality and diversity in the broadcasting sector ; to
“ We urge politicians and policy makers to ensure our sector ’ s competitive strength in the long term .” help European broadcasters compete with less regulated global online players and to innovate in response to changing audience demands , and to maximise their investment in European content and the creation of
European jobs . However , it is instead set to represent a step backwards .
Specifically , they suggest the proposed amendments would :
• Limit broadcasters ’ freedom to provide channels to EU audiences by undermining common rules that apply irrespective of where a channel is based and creating unnecessary uncertainty in establishment criteria . This risks damaging choice and plurality especially in smaller markets and all but destroying the Country of Origin principle on a practical level ( Articles 2 , 3 , 4 , 9 ).
• Restrict the main revenue source for broadcasting companies by introducing new advertising constraints while maintaining outdated legacy provisions . This will limit broadcasters ’ ability to react to consumer demand for highquality content and effectively compete with less regulated global online players ( Articles 9 , 10 , 11 , 19 , 20 , 23 ).
• Introduce strict financial requirements such as levies on broadcasters ’ linear and nonlinear services . This will apply to broadcasters who are already among the biggest investors in European content , and prevent channels from taking an innovative approach to funding content in response to changing audience demand ( Article 13 ). “ Europe ’ s broadcasting sector has been a success story over the tenyear lifetime of the current AVMS Directive , steadily increasing investment in European content , jobs and the number of channels that EU citizens can choose from ,” they declare . “ As European broadcasting associations with members across the EU , we urge politicians and policy makers to ensure our sector ’ s competitive strength in the long term by delivering on the original stated aim of this review ‘ to create a fairer environment for all players ’,” they conclude .
The grouping comprises the Association of Commercial Television in Europe ( ACT ); the Commercial Broadcasters Association ( COBA ); Confindustria Radio Televisioni ( CRTV ); the European association of Television and Radio Sales houses ( egta ) and VPRT .
UK consults on ‘ Kodi box ’ ban
The UK ’ s Intellectual Property Office ( IPO ) is calling for views on whether there is any need for legislative change to deal with the issue of illicit IPTV streaming devices . According to the IPO , the use of IPTV boxes to access illegal content appears to have increased in recent months .
Such boxes were originally designed to allow consumers to stream legitimate content ( locally stored or legal online content ). Despite the legitimate use of this
equipment , software is widely available ( illicit Kodi extensions being the best known ) which connect the boxes to illegal content through streaming websites , file lockers and BitTorrent trackers .
Configuring IPTV boxes in this way allows the consumer to easily access subscription TV , sports and films for the one-off price of a box ( usually £ 40 [€ 47.21 ] to £ 50 ). It is claimed that the ease of use of these boxes , the wide range of illicit content available and the fact they are freely available from a
number of well-known online retailers as well as physical stores , has led to a sharp rise in their use by consumers . Broadcasters and content owners have voiced concerns that , although a range of existing legislation applies to the sale and use of these devices ( as well as the provision of illicit content streams ), the legal framework does not
provide sufficient tools to tackle this growing threat .
The government is keen to understand where further action might be necessary to address this problem . The IPO is therefore seeking views from those with knowledge and experience in dealing with IPTV boxes .
The consultation finishes on April 7th 2017 .
8 EUROMEDIA