News
News
Broadcasters resist EC Directive changes
A grouping of Europe’ s commercial broadcasters has warned that proposed changes to the AVMS( Audiovisual Media Services) Directive are a step backwards that risks damaging growth, audience choice and investment in European content, instead of delivering the Commission’ s stated aim of fostering Europe’ s digital economy.
When the European Commission embarked on the current review, vice president Andrus Ansip pledged to enable audiovisual companies,“ to be the powerhouses in the digital economy, not weigh them down with unnecessary rules”. But instead of deregulation, the broadcasters’ grouping contends that the current proposals will increase restrictions- jeopardising investment in European content, increasing unfair competition with online players, and undermining the freedom to broadcast.
European broadcasters say they are already responsible for the majority of commercial investment in European content, pay significant taxes and provide highly regulated services that are subject to robust audience protections, particularly for minors. The review of the AVMS Directive is a once-in-a-decade opportunity to promote media plurality and diversity in the broadcasting sector; to
“ We urge politicians and policy makers to ensure our sector’ s competitive strength in the long term.” help European broadcasters compete with less regulated global online players and to innovate in response to changing audience demands, and to maximise their investment in European content and the creation of
European jobs. However, it is instead set to represent a step backwards.
Specifically, they suggest the proposed amendments would:
• Limit broadcasters’ freedom to provide channels to EU audiences by undermining common rules that apply irrespective of where a channel is based and creating unnecessary uncertainty in establishment criteria. This risks damaging choice and plurality especially in smaller markets and all but destroying the Country of Origin principle on a practical level( Articles 2, 3, 4, 9).
• Restrict the main revenue source for broadcasting companies by introducing new advertising constraints while maintaining outdated legacy provisions. This will limit broadcasters’ ability to react to consumer demand for highquality content and effectively compete with less regulated global online players( Articles 9, 10, 11, 19, 20, 23).
• Introduce strict financial requirements such as levies on broadcasters’ linear and nonlinear services. This will apply to broadcasters who are already among the biggest investors in European content, and prevent channels from taking an innovative approach to funding content in response to changing audience demand( Article 13).“ Europe’ s broadcasting sector has been a success story over the tenyear lifetime of the current AVMS Directive, steadily increasing investment in European content, jobs and the number of channels that EU citizens can choose from,” they declare.“ As European broadcasting associations with members across the EU, we urge politicians and policy makers to ensure our sector’ s competitive strength in the long term by delivering on the original stated aim of this review‘ to create a fairer environment for all players’,” they conclude.
The grouping comprises the Association of Commercial Television in Europe( ACT); the Commercial Broadcasters Association( COBA); Confindustria Radio Televisioni( CRTV); the European association of Television and Radio Sales houses( egta) and VPRT.
UK consults on‘ Kodi box’ ban
The UK’ s Intellectual Property Office( IPO) is calling for views on whether there is any need for legislative change to deal with the issue of illicit IPTV streaming devices. According to the IPO, the use of IPTV boxes to access illegal content appears to have increased in recent months.
Such boxes were originally designed to allow consumers to stream legitimate content( locally stored or legal online content). Despite the legitimate use of this
|
equipment, software is widely available( illicit Kodi extensions being the best known) which connect the boxes to illegal content through streaming websites, file lockers and BitTorrent trackers.
Configuring IPTV boxes in this way allows the consumer to easily access subscription TV, sports and films for the one-off price of a box( usually £ 40 [€ 47.21 ] to £ 50). It is claimed that the ease of use of these boxes, the wide range of illicit content available and the fact they are freely available from a
|
number of well-known online retailers as well as physical stores, has led to a sharp rise in their use by consumers. Broadcasters and content owners have voiced concerns that, although a range of existing legislation applies to the sale and use of these devices( as well as the provision of illicit content streams), the legal framework does not |
provide sufficient tools to tackle this growing threat.
The government is keen to understand where further action might be necessary to address this problem. The IPO is therefore seeking views from those with knowledge and experience in dealing with IPTV boxes.
The consultation finishes on April 7th 2017.
|
8 EUROMEDIA |
|
|
|