eTwinning Visibility Newsletter no. 3 eTwinning Visibility Newsletter no. 3 | Page 59

Visibility of eTwinning Projects Group July 2013 Newsletter -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Portugal is not different… in 2012 national examinations were introduced in primary education for Grade 4 students, an approach only used by Indonesia and the United States, according to OCDE indicators (2012). Times were tests were to provide both teachers and students information about what’s going on, kids weren’t ranking and there was a lot of cooperative work and cooperative projects which encouraged us to study, ask challenging questions (Falcone,2012) seems now a mirage… So where does eTwinning fit in all this scenery? As a language teacher in a lower secondary school, I regarded it no longer as a reality! After developing eTwinning projects since 2007, I was left with no other option than leaving aside the eTwinning community. At the beginning of the year I had before me two options: if I used the three 45’ class a week for developing eTwinning collaborative contents, I would not be able to embrace the 5th and 6th years grades curriculum; if I asked pupils to produce materials at home that I would then post in the TwinSpace, then they would not be developing real cooperative and intercultural exchange, the basis of eTwinning vision. Saying all these, is eTwinning in the brisk of losing its soul and become just a mere instrument of European policies?… in fact I have no numbers or studies to support the above statement. However I believe, at least in my country, that two plots are likely to emerge: either eTwinning mentors demand upon who has responsibility in Portuguese education policies that project and cooperative work is again considered in the curriculum or the action will soon be a result of singular pieces of work not linked by the four pillars of education recommended by Delors (1996): learning to know, learning to do, learning to live together, learning to be. And that I would not like to witness! References: [1] Minder, R., (2013). Search for cuts puts Portugal’s schools on chopping block. The New York Times - Europe. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/26/world/eu rope/portugals-education-system-fa cescuts.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0). Last access 29/06/2013. [2] Falcone, D. (2013). Noam Chomsky on democracy and education in the 21st century and beyond. Truthout. Available at: http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/16651noam-chomsky-on-democracy-and-educationin-the-21st-century-and-beyond. Last access 29/06/2013. [3] OCDE Indicators (2012). Education at a glance – country note - Portugal. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/education/CN%20%20Portugal.pdf. Last access 29/06/2013. [4] Delors, J., (1996). Learning: the treasure within – report to UNESCO of the international commission on education for the twenty-first century. Available at: http://www.unesco.org/delors/delors_e.pdf. Last access 29/06/2013. Helena Serdoura from Portugal is a teacher of English as a foreign language and of Portuguese as a mother tongue, at a lower secondary school with children aged 10 to 14. Master’s dissertation in “eTwinning action: strengths and weaknesses in the promotion of competences in learning foreign languages”. (2011). Braga, Portugal: University of Minho. 59