English Project December 18 2012 | Page 3

Editorial

Though the need for both night owls and morning larks is evident, we believe that night owls should be dominant in society. They should have greater roles in business and politics, because of the evidence of greater IQ levels among other things. Night owls are superior to morning larks, and we should treat them as so.

Night owls are much more physically and mentally stronger, so they should play a more prominent role in society. Morning larks are not as strong in the physical sense because their cerebral activity weakens throughout the day while their spinal activity grows, causing them to not achieve the levels of strength that are achieved by their night owl peers. Because of this, morning larks should be positioned in shifts and jobs that require working in earlier hours, while night owls should be positioned in more evening-based jobs.

We also believe that we should focus on the reproduction of the more capable type of human, the night owl, by enacting laws limiting the number of children morning larks can have. This would reduce overpopulation, and also strengthen the human race by reducing the amount of inferior beings. In another direction, we could take a step forward with the research on night and day people and use our new-found knowledge to change people from morning larks to night owls by way of the brain and spiral chord. This way, we could continue to improve humanity and keep the positive traits of night owls, while also keeping the positive traits of morning larks and giving people the choice to improve themselves. With the advancement in technology, these things are becoming much more possible and real. In the near future, we could be taking great steps to an improved mankind.