EnergySafe Magazine May 2014, issue 35 | Page 12

12 Electrical news Coming to grips with the safe use of HV gloves The Victorian High Voltage Customers Committee advised Energy Safe Victoria that there were safety concerns about the use of high voltage rubber gloves with leather outer-gloves, which are commonly used for mechanical protection during HV switching. The issue was risk of electric shock or flashover related to the distance between the cuffs of the HV inner rubber glove and the cuff of the leather protector glove. Optec, a specialist HV training company, arranged testing to be carried out at the Silcar offices in Moe. Testing was designed to investigate whether there is a risk of electric shock when the HV gloves are used. To understand the results there is a requirement to understand the test performed. The gloves were tested in water with leather outer-gloves fitted. It was found that with leather outer-gloves fitted, depending on the distance between the cuff of the leather glove and the cuff of the rubber glove, a flash over or leakage could occur if the over-glove reduces the clearance between the two cuffs more than the water does. The test results showed that the glove can fail due to two possibilities: 1/ he glove insulation between the two water T bodies breaks down. This tests the integrity of the glove’s operational surface. 2/ he surface area above the water line leaks T current between the electrodes or flashes over. As the leather over-gloves absorb water it should not greatly change the result of the first test as it will conduct just as the water would. However, the second test checking the flashover would be affected by the leather over-gloves and, depending on the distance between the cuff of the leather glove and cuff of the rubber glove, a flash over or leakage will occur if the over-glove reduces the clearance between the two cuffs more than the water does. After further research, the only standard that specified a distance that should be maintained between the cuff of the leather outer-glove and the cuff of the rubber glove is ASTM F496, an American standard. ESV thanks Alan Harlow, National Operation Manager at OPTEC, for the information. Suitable: Sufficient distance shown between leather outer-glove and rubber glove underneath. Not suitable: There’s insufficient distance between the cuffs of both gloves. Maximum use voltage AC/DC Glove class Minimum distance between protectors and rubber gloves 1000/1500 0 ½ inch 13mm 7500/11,250 1 1 inch 25mm 17,000/25,500 2 2 inch 51mm 26,500/39,750 3 3 inch 76mm 36,00/54,000 4 4 inch 102mm Advertorial Increased safety for PV systems with integrated DC isolators DC isolators in PV systems are imperative to ensure work being carried out on a PV system/ inverter is safe as they protect installers and PV system owners from dangerous high voltages. External isolators are generally a safe option, however there have been cases in the past when external isolators have created additional hazards due to wrong sizing or incorrect installation. It is essential that the DC isolators are appropriately sized, compliant and installed correctly. These potential points of failure are eliminated when using integrated isolators. It must also be ensured that integrated isolators are safe. In 2012, the revision of AS/NZS 5033 was updated to make it possible for isolators to be integrated by inverter manufacturers given that they met certain requirements. Summed up, the requirements for integrated isolators as per AS/NZS 5033:2012 are as follows: »» DC switch is of utilisation category DC 21B (see chapter 4.3.5.1) »» DC switch disconnector is certified to IEC 60947 (see chapter 4.3.5.2) »» DC switch disconnector is not polarity sensitive (see chapter 4.3.5.2) »» DC switch disconnector is able to interrupt full load and the maximum fault currents from the PV array attached to the inverter (see chapter 4.3.5.2) »» DC switch disconnector interrupts all live conductors simultaneously (see chapter 4.3.5.2) »» DC switch disconnector isolates the inverter from all poles of the array such that maintenance of the inverter is possible without risk of electrical hazards (see chapter 4.4.1.2) »» The DC switch disconnector is interlocked so that the inverter can only be removed or connected when the switch is in the open position (see chapter 4.4.1.2). New inverters such as the Fronius Galvo and Fronius Symo (launched in 2013 and 2014 respectively) have been specifically designed with integrated DC isolators that comply with AS/NZS 5033:2012. The integrated DC isolators featured in the Fronius Galvo and Fronius Symo are tested to AS 4777:2005 Part 2 and 3 together with the inverter, sized by the manufacturer and equipped with a mechanical interlock (to ensure isolation prior to installation or service). T