EnergySafe Magazine Autumn/Winter 2018, issue 50 | Page 11

11 For all the latest energy safety news visit www.esv.vic.gov.au Autumn/Winter 2018 energysafe issue 50 Electrical equipment approvals in Australia — how we got here By Jean-Marie Ntahonkiriye, Compliance Officer, Electrical Equipment and Safety Since the earliest days of electricity supply in Australia, supply authorities have had the responsibility of checking the safety of electrical installations and the equipment connected to their supply systems. The first introduction of a scheme to control the safety of appliances and equipment at the point-of-sale came in 1934, when approvals legislation was enacted in Victoria. New South Wales (NSW) introduced comparable legislation in 1935 with Queensland following in 1938, South Australia in 1940, Tasmania in 1944 and Western Australia in 1946. The Electrical Approvals Board In Victoria, the Electrical Approvals Board was constituted to give effect to the approvals legislation relating to the approval of electrical appliances and accessories to ensure safe operation in service. The Electrical Approvals Board consisted of a Chairman appointed by the State Electricity Commission of Victoria (SEC) and six members representing supply undertakers (municipal electrical supply authorities), suppliers and manufacturers of electrical equipment, electrical contractors, fire authorities and other stakeholders. The Board made recommendations to the SEC with respect to granting, withholding and withdrawing approvals of any prescribed article, and acted on behalf of the Victorian Chief Electrical Inspector in the acceptance of non-prescribed articles. In 1935, Approvals Regulations setting out fees to be paid and Prescribing Orders covering certain electrical appliances and accessories were gazetted under the provisions of the State Electricity Commission Act. The 1935, NSW’s scheme was a relatively simple one operating on a guarantee basis. Manufacturers or importers who gave an undertaking to comply with Standards Association of Australia (SAA) specifications were allocated a registered guarantee number, which could be marked on compliant articles. Permission to use this number could be withdrawn if the articles were found not to comply. The legislation in each state differed. Each state operated within its own jurisdiction and there was no reciprocity between them. As a result, the procedure for obtaining approval to sell goods throughout Australia was cumbersome and time consuming. In the post World War II era, the surge in the variety of electrical appliances and equipment made it difficult to regulate the supply of electrical equipment throughout Australia. Without a standard approach, issues pertaining to electrical safety were a growing problem. A uniform approvals scheme In 1949, a committee sponsored by the Electrical Supply Association of Australia (ESAA) determined that a draft uniform approvals scheme should be prepared. Subsequently, it commissioned the Victorian Chief Electrical Inspector and the Supervising Engineer from the Electricity Authority of New South Wales (EANSW) to undertake the task. Their report embodied eight main principles to form the basis of a uniform approvals scheme. 1. Where the use of electrical articles may present a danger to the public, they must be prescribed. 2. Prescribed articles are required to comply with published specifications and all states should agree that these specifications shall be the Approval and Test Specifications (A&TS) published by the SAA. 3. Prescribed articles of any class may only be allowed to be offered for sale if the sample is first examined, tested, and found to comply with the published specifications. 4. There will be mutual recognition of approval where applicants are required to submit articles for test and examination in one state only – preferably the state of manufacture or import. These are then automatically legalised for sale in other states with a minimum of formalities. 5. Prescribed articles are marked to indicate which state delivered the original approval. 6. If at any time a state chooses to withdraw the original approval, other regulatory authorities should agree to accept their decision and take the required steps to implement similar action. 7. Ensure that administrative procedure is as simple as possible. 8. The interstate committee with representatives from state regulatory authorities achieve uniformity in their practice. In 1952, all states agreed to become parties to a uniform approvals scheme to endorse the principles in the report, and to promulgate new approval regulations in line with the model regulations. A new committee, the Regulatory Authorities Approvals Committee (RAAC) was formed to oversee the scheme and was placed under the Chairmanship of a member from the ESAA executive and the secretariat function was provided by the EANSW. A major development of the RAAC was the introduction of a professed ‘single certificate arrangement’ in 1958. With this arrangement, once receiving an approval from their ‘home’ state, a manufacturer or importer could market its approved article throughout Australia without needing to approach other states. In other words, an approval issued in any one state was automatically recognised for sale throughout Australia up until it was withdrawn by the issuing state. Legislation across all states was similar, with each contributing to the prescription of articles that may not be sold or offered for sale, unless approved and marked with a certified approval marking. Continue reading on page 25. From the archieves