ENCYCLOPÉDIE DE LA RECHERCHE SUR L’ALUMINIUM AU QUÉBEC 2013 | Page 16

14 PRODUCTION D’ALUMINIUM ALUMINIUM PRODUCTION Ventilation réduite du dessus des cuves d’électrolyse : influence sur le bilan thermique VENTILATION RÉDUITE DU DESSUS DES CUVES cuves et la salle des cuves dans les D’ÉLECTROLYSE : INFLUENCE SUR LE BILAN THERMIQUE DANS LES CUVES ET LA SALLE DES CUVES REDUCED VENTILATION OF UPPER PART OF ALUMINUM REDUCED VENTILATION IN THE UPPER PART OF ALUMINUM SMELTING POT : SMELTING POT: INFLUENCE ON HEAT BALANCE IN POTS INFLUENCE ON HEAT BALANCE IN POTS AND POTROOM AND POTROOM Ruijie Zhao1, Louis Gosselin1, Mario Farfard2, Donald P. Ziegler3 1Aluminium Research Centre-REGAL and Departement of Mechanical Engineering Université Laval, Québec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada 2 NSERC/Alcoa Industrial Research Chair MACE3 and Aluminium Research Centre – REGAL Université Laval, Québec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada 3 Alcoa Global Primary, Metals Alcoa Technical Center, 100 Technical Drive, Alcoa Center, PA 15069 Maintaining normal draft condition in the upper part of aluminum smelting cells requires significant amount of electricity for the operation of the fans. Assuming an average price of electricity of 0.05 US$/kWh, the annual cost of electricity for running pot ventilation system is 2.5 MUS$ in a plant such as ADQ (260,000 ton Al/y). If one can reduce by 50% the ventilation rate, the fan power can be roughly reduce to ~1/8th of the current level. In the perspective of waste heat recovery, the reduction of pot ventilation can significantly increase the exhaust gas temperature (by 50-60˚C by reducing 50% of normal draft condition). Moreover, it will induce less moisture into the pot and reduce the HF emissions. Finally, once successfully implemented, it will allow to downsize the GTC. 9000 2. To estimate thermal condition in potroom: more heat escapes from hoods and superstructure, so the temperature in potroom should be verified, especially in extremely hot weather. 3. To verify pot tightness in reduced pot ventilation: less vaccum in pot cavity, tighter pots might be required. qtop qbath 8000 7000 q(W) 1. To maintain top heat loss: the heat transfer rate extracted from the bath by the top of the cell is reduced by 10% as the ventilation rate is reduced by half. (900 W missing per anode) 6000 Problem 1 Top heat loss enhancement qgas+rod qgas • 5000 4000 • 3000 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3 Draft(Nm /s) 3.5 4.0 Figure 1. Heat transfer rate from different components Different scenarios tested: fins addition on anode assemble, modification of gap geometry and change of anode cover configuration case c2 High efficiency: case c2 (exposing more stubs in cavity), compensating almost 900 W 4.5 Reason: no interference of additional structure with the radiation transfer, enhancement both in convection and radiation • Moderate efficiency: case b2 (horizontal gap), compensating 400 W case b2 Reason: Convection enhancement reduces surface temperature, and then reduces radiation heat transfer Problem 1 (pot model A) 1. 2. Problem 2 CFD model: 1/20 pot slice model, from the bath free surface to the potroom, SST k-ω turbulence model. 1. Flow pattern under different ventilation conditions: streamline colored by temperature Objectives: To study the top heat loss in normal and 50% reduced ventilation, To obtain the heat losses from hoods, superstructure and exhaust gas as the boundary conditions for potroom model, To estimate different design maintaining top heat loss. modifications Schematic view of pot model A for Only buoyancy driven ventilation Problem 2 (potroom model) 1. CFD model: a potroom slice model including two ½ pot, SST k- turbulence model. With medium wind effect (10km/h) 2. Thermal conditions under different pot ventilation in extremely hot weather: temperature field in potroom 2. Objectives: Tamb=30˚C, Vwind=10 km/h from northwest To study the flow pattern and temperature field under different outdoor conditions (wind, temperature), Schematic view of potroom model To estimate the temperature in potroom under different pot ventilation levels (normal and 50% reduction), Ruijie Zhao Louis Gosselin Centre de recherche sur l’aluminium - REGAL, Département de génie mécanique, Université Laval Mario Fafard Chaire de recherche industrielle CRSNG/Alcoa MACE3, Centre de recherche sur l’aluminium - REGAL, Université Laval Donald Ziegler Alcoa Technical Center To obtain the flow velocity, pressure and temperature in the area near pots, which are used as boundary condition for the model of problem 3. Problem 3 (pot model B) 1. CFD model: 1/10 pot slice model and pot end model, a large portion of potroom included in order to have more accurate boundary conditions extracted from potroom model Normal pot ventilation 50% normal pot ventilation 2. Objectives: To verify the efficiency of hoods and superstructure under lower pot ventilation level, Schematic view of pot model B To modify current pot structure to achieve a better tightness in low draft condition. Pot model A Top heat loss enhancement 2. Optimizing the jet flow field is not enough to recover the reduction of top heat loss under the low ventilation condition studied here. Thermal condition in potroom Simulation Strategy Thermal BCs Potroom model HF conc. in potroom 1. In order to enhanc