Encyclopedie de la recherche sur l'aluminium au Quebec - Edition 2014 | Page 37

PRODUCTION DE Multiphase modelingL’ALUMINIUM // ALUMINIUM PRODUCTION of the cryolite bath with solidification 35 MODÉLISATION MULTIPHASE DE LA CRYOLITE AVEC SOLIDIFICATION Modélisation multiphase de la MULTIPHASE MODELING OF THE CRYOLITE BATH WITH SOLIDIFICATION cryolite avec solidification Dave Martin12, Patrice Goulet12, Jean-Loup Robert12, Donald Ziegler3, and Mario Fafard12 1Department 2NSERC/Alcoa of Civil Engineering, 1065 avenue de la Médecine Université Laval, Québec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada Industrial Research Chair MACE3 and Aluminium Research Centre – REGAL Université Laval, Québec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada 3Alcoa Primary Metals, Alcoa Technical Center, 100 Technical Drive, Alcoa Center, PA, 15069-0001, USA Interface Introduction Phase change phenomena in the cryolite bath have an important effect on anode changes and ledge thickness which mainly impacts on energy efficiency and cell life span. A better understanding of the processes will help increase performance and lower operating costs. However, the harsh environment prohibits detailed experiments and numerical simulations were an evident alternative to circumvent these difficulties. The main challenge of this project is managing the interface. To account for change in behaviour at the interface, the XFEM technique is used. It allows us to maintain a sharp interface without remeshing. Level Set solution Preliminary Results: Testing the Method The following results show the solidification of water in a corner. The triangular elements shown are used to generate the integration scheme and display the results properly. Problematic and objectives A numerical model must include the heat transfer and fluid dynamics in the cell and the electrolyte’s phase change. The important density variation (~30%, whereas water is ~8%) introduces special challenges. The excess mass as the liquid solidifies acts as an flux boundary for the fluid phase. Furthermore, the phase change is driven by the jump in heat flux (q) across the boundary. These jumps in the solution require special numerical attention. Heat and mass transfer at interface Theory Analytical solution Here is the flow of water around a cylinder in a channel (no mass flux on lower and upper boundaries). A pressure differential at each end drives the flow. Conclusion • Phase change model reproduces cryolite physics • Viable tool in predicting cell behaviour • Discontinuities can move in time without remeshing → shorter solve time • Error controllable using numerical tools Future work Dave Martin Patrice Goulet Jean-Loup Robert Mario Fafard Département de génie civil, Chaire de recherche industrielle CRSNG/Alcoa MACE3, Centre de recherche sur l’aluminium - REGAL, Université Laval Donald Ziegler Alcoa Technical Center, Alcoa Primary Metals •Complete 2D tests •Add mass flux boundary condition (fluid flow) •Couple phase change and fluid flow problems Journée des étudiants – REGAL process uses a very corrosive electrolytic bath at about 960°C. The Hall-Héroult Le procédé Hall-Héroult utilise un bain de cryolite très corrosif à une température 18 novembre sur d’environ 960  °C. Lors du changement d’anode, une couche solide se forme 2014 l’anode froide. De plus, une couche solide est maintenue sur les parois de la cuve pour la protéger. L’épaisseur de ces couches solides modifie considérablement l’efficacité de la réaction. Prédire ces phénomènes à partir d’un modèle numérique est donc un élément clé afin de réduire les coûts d’exploitation de l’usine. Par contre, les discontinuités physiques associées au changement de phase posent des défis pour la simulation numérique. La méthode par éléments finis étendus (XFEM) a été exploitée pour surmonter ces difficultés. During anode changeout, a solid layer forms on the cool anode. Furthermore, a solid layer of electrolytic bath is maintained on the walls of the cell to protect it. The thickness of these solid layers significantly alters the efficiency of the chemical reaction. Predicting these phenomena from a numerical model is therefore a key element in lowering the operating costs of the plant. However, the physical discontinuities associated with the phase change involve important numerical challenges. An extended finite element method (XFEM) was used to overcome these difficulties.