Emmanuel Magazine September/October 2017 | Page 9

Answering the Dubia: Sense and Sensibility in Amoris Laetitia application of principles tends to cruelty. Mercy, on the other hand, listens for the voice of Jesus in the particular circumstances it faces. Mercy is so central to the Gospel that Saint Paul doubted that law retained any relevance at all (Rom 10:4; Gal 2:16). Francis understands that in certain circumstances people can paint themselves into a corner. The response that “sin has unfortunate consequences” pays too little attention to the power of mercy. Francis proposes that in appropriate cases, partners in a second marriage may enter a period of discernment, accompanied by an experienced priest, so they can reflect on relevant issues. After a suitable period of time, they may celebrate a sacramental confession in which they accept an appropriate penance and receive absolution. Communion may follow that discernment and penance (AL, 305). Discussion around Amoris Laetitia has grown tense, particularly when people suggest it can cause a schism in the Church. Issues don’t cause schisms. People do. Such a case may involve, for example, a man who selfishly leaves his wife early in a valid marriage. He obtains a civil divorce and marries another. Years go by. Eventually, after the second marriage produces four children, the man comes to his senses about the first marriage. He admits his earlier selfish ways and seeks pardon and forgiveness. What does conversion require of him? Is he supposed to leave his second wife and their children to return to his first wife? That would constitute a sinful refusal of his duties to the four children. What if his first wife will not have him back? What if she has remarried? Is there no way for the repentant husband to stay in the second “marriage” and still receive Communion? As indicated in the first of the dubia, the traditional response to this unfortunate circumstance requires him and his second wife to live in a “brother-sister” relationship — denying to each other normal conjugal relationships. Some circumstances may indeed call for such an arrangement. Some may not. Can nothing be done? Each of the dubia submitted by the cardinals revolves around the notion that these second marriages always constitute adultery, and 287