eGaming Review January 2012 | Page 17

[P R O D U C T REVIEW ] ? Starting from this month eGR introduces its new player panel review THEFACTOR SLOTS PANEL REVIEW X X FACTOR: PLAYER This month we are extending our usual looking at usability, design, engagement and section. Foviance's regular user experience playability. This month we look at the latest review will appear on one side, however X Factor slot game that aims to offer players parallel to this will be a new player review a great gaming experience using one of the page taking the opinions of a sample of most recognisable brands of the last decade. tough regulation.poker, bingo players and If you have any games you think we should regular casino, Probably, that only means Nevada and New Jersey.” their views on the review or any comments on the reviews sports bettors and getting latest games, apps Fahrenkopf, .in contrast published please email editor James Bennett Second, added and products The sample panel, different such as that introduced to earlier bills every month, will examine at [email protected]. ? exactly by same criteria as Foviance last year the Barney Frank – re-introduced (Players' views are their own.) in March this year by Congressman John The American Gaming Association (AGA) Campbell – states would have to opt in will not support Congressman Joe Barton’s to any regulatory regime emerging from internet poker bill and will instead push the AGA-backed poker-only bill. “States new legislation in the autumn which wouldbalance, the bet automatically be included would not detailing the ? From a player nice idea in a video but it moves favour Nevada and New Jerseyandlicensing paid are way too as how much as states where you can gamble online perspective, what are too fast to understand exactly how and initial thoughts on a future US State legislators would no option to yourregulatory authorities in small and there iswith online poker.the games works. Text and be a egaming market. hide these in casegovernorswalks someone would have to take where you can click what you see? better option a?rmative in. I like the way you can move say, we want our people own The AGA-backed poker-only action to Player 1 Relatively clear interface – through each page at your bill a generic slot machine Barton dra to in a seamless similar towould also di?er from the from game to game game.” pace. Not too sure what happened way, the monies Player 2 how resulting tax revenues would be you have are when it showed me the be on Initial thoughts are that it Third, said Fahrenkopf, re would options USABILITY transferred over delineation is extremely excitingfederal and state level. “Taxes without any between those choose, so I just pressed you can companies that split between and matches problem at all. the X Factor be divided between the state where play. The balance, bet and would television show with got out of the market with UIGEA’s passage,paid Player 2 Initially I was extremely the same music, design, voice could be clearer and bigger, the bettor is, with the state where the and those that did not. I don’t know exactly and engaged, given the great and some of the well-known Fairly simple if maybe featured at the bottom regulator is. The federal government would the game. what that would be, but assume there you have played introduction to personalities who have taken part next to the play and autoplay only receive the income tax on winnings,” around 20be a ‘penalty box’”. Fahrenkopf said online previously. However, after would spins in the programme. button. The music became a said Frank Fahrenkopf, chief of the attention began tounderstanding little repetitive. company his wane, not was that if a my powerful Player 3 The branding is clear and US land-based casino representative and I could not get the US post-UIGEA, a lot happened had stayed in you immediately know who the DESIGN involved other than simply press organisation (pictured). they would be barred from any ? What is missing? game is f