eGaming Review December 2013 | Page 48

COMING TO AMERICA T he dust has finally settled on the North American egaming industry for 2013. In a historic year for across the Pond, Nevada, Delaware and New Jersey have all launched regulated online gambing markets. The industry’s eyes are now on these firebrand states to see if regulated internet gambling will be a success. Should financial gains be as lucrative as expected, next year stands to be even more frenetic as egaming power players snatch up their share of North America’s fastest growing market. For European suppliers the most lucrative US markets are those yet to come. Nevada is currently a two-player market, with Ultimate Poker and the Caesars-owned World Series of Poker the only platforms live in the state. Poor liquidity and lengthy testing processes have seen operators focus their efforts on New Jersey, where expected revenues are higher. Delaware, meanwhile, where gaming is overseen by the state lottery, is pretty much a closed book to all but 888, WMS and Scientific Games, which won a joint bid to provide its software and platforms. So there has been a great deal of speculation over which states will regulate egaming in 2014. The general consensus is California or Pennsylvania will be the first to reveal their hand, with Illinois, and maybe even New York, not far behind. Each state faces its own barriers to legalisation, but with big markets and even bigger revenues at stake, the momentum created this year might just see those hurdles overcome. GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY The framework for online gambling in California is almost perfect. With a population of more than 38 million people, potential revenues are huge and unlike most other states it can easily sustain its own poker liquidity. And with three separate online poker bills currently under consideration, there is a clear desire for legalised egaming in the Golden State. This time last year California’s Native American tribes remained divided over how online poker should be regulated, who should be allowed to partake, and how much it should cost. The only joint effort between those interests – the California Online Poker Association – crumbled as legislation failed and its larger members grew tired of waiting. A handful of gaming tribes bit the bullet and entered online partnerships, including the United Auburn Indian Community with bwin.party, while the influential Pala Band of Mission Indians has launched its own interactive business. Yet from a legislative point of view, it’s been a stalemate. Yet recent months have shown what seems to be a growing impetus for the tribes, plus legislators, regulators and egaming operators, to sit round the table and discuss a bill to meet everyone’s needs. While all three bills would only permit online poker, differences in the proposals prevent interested parties from agreeing on a single bill to suit all parties. The main areas of disagreement have been the licence fee, “bad actor” prohibitions, tribal regulatory involvement and licence eligibility, with some politicians arguing 46 racetracks should be able to offer online poker. Unsurprisingly in a state where tribes have the exclusive right – along with card rooms – to any form table games, the latter suggestion has not been well received. If any bill is going to progress it will need the backing of the tribal community, which remains staunchly protective of its sovereignty and gaming revenues. A draft introduced earlier this year backed by eight tribes including Pechanga, Agua Caliente and Borona appears the realistic way forward from here. WAITING IN LINE With a population of more than 12.5 million, Pennsylvania is among the biggest prizes to be won in the shift to a regulated US market. Not only does it have a sizeable population, it also boasts a successful land-based casino market and a relatively high level of personal wealth. Senator Tommy Tomlinson brought the prospect of egaming there back to life in September when he announced he would reintroduce a bill to legalise internet gambling in the state. Previous attempts to STATE PENNSYLVANIA STATUS: POPULATION (M) GDP PER CAPITA (000s) 13M $44.3 MARKET SIZE ($) 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 SOURCE: EILERS RESEARCH, LLC $585 www.egrmagazine.com