EdCal EdCal v49.30 6/10/19 | Page 5

June 10, 2019 RETIRE Continued from page 1 histories include both Social Security- covered and non-covered employment can have their Social Security payments cut drastically. GPO only applies to gov- ernment workers and reduces the spousal Social Security benefits and widower’s benefits for individuals who retire from CalSTRS. In many cases, the spousal ben- efit is reduced to zero.  The delegation highlighted testimoni- als from education leaders to illustrate to legislative staff the need for reform. ACSA Retirement Committee Chair Olson encountered this issue firsthand when she worked as a CalSTRS benefits counselor after retiring from public education.  “Time after time I would meet with educators who had done midlife career changes. As I would talk and listen to them to help them determine what their retire- ment benefit could be, it was clear to see that this was a fairness issue,” she said. “We shared many poignant examples of how this effects real-life retired educators.” As an example, she told the story of Jay, a special education teacher. He came to public education at the age of 45 after a career in private industry. When he retired his pension was in the high $30,000s. His Social Security was reduced by about 40 percent. “He is not having a very comfortable retirement,” Olson said. Delegate Petrossian said ACSA’s national advocacy on retirement issues impacts not only ACSA members but all educators in California. “During the last decade ACSA’s Retirement Committee has expressed serious concern with the unfair actions at the federal level for those who have earned Social Security and cannot access the rightful earnings,” Petrossian said. “ACSA representatives made it very clear to legis- lators and their staff that educators in 35 states receiving Social Security payments without penalties while 15 states educators do NOT have access to Social Security was both discriminatory and unjust.” ACSA supports repealing the Windfall Elimination Provision and Government Pension Offset, or at a minimum replacing these with a formula that equalizes benefits for California’s school employees. Teaching is not a highly-paid profession and impos- ing the WEP formula results in significant EDCAL   5 high school or college years or by working in private employment during the summer months after they become teachers. Such jobs result in modest Social Security ben- efits, but these workers will be subject to the same WEP reduction as workers who receive much higher Social Security ben- efits. The Government Pension Offset has the harsh effect of undermining the origi- nal purpose of the Social Security depen- dent/survivor benefit. The GPO discourag- es individuals and spouses who have earned Social Security benefits from entering into CalSTRS-covered employment because of the spousal offset, which again, harms the teaching profession’s ability to attract and For more retain talent. information The retirement on retirement delegation met with advocacy or legislative office rep- to share your resentatives to discuss story, e-mail legislation centered Adonai Mack at on these issues, H.R. amack@acsa. 141 the Social Security org. Fairness Act (Davis) and S. 521 Social Security Fairness Act (Brown). For three days they met with members of the House Ways and Means Committee and the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee as well as the Senate Finance Committee. ACSA del- egates also met with representatives from the offices of Sens. Patty Murray (WA), Chuck Grassley (IA), Ron Wyden (KS), Mike Enzi (WY), Dianne Feinstein and Kamala Harris (CA), and Reps. Linda Sanchez (CA-38), Kevin Brady (TX-8), Jimmy Panetta (CA-20), John Larson (CT-1), Mike Thompson (CA-5), Judy Chu, and Jimmy Gomez (CA-34). “As we shared our ACSA position on the WEP and GPO with each House of Representative or State Senator staff mem- ber, the resounding response was unified and clear — it is our association members’ stories that are invaluable in our political action advocacy work,” said retirement del- egate Hutcherson. “I cannot encourage our members enough — make your presence on the Hill a priority for your continual professional development! I cannot express how appreciative I am of the support of Wes Smith, the Board, and our Executive Committee for exemplifying that, as retir- ees, we can and do make a difference in serving our ASCA members.” FYI Top: The delegation met with staffers at Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s office in Washington, D.C. From left, Chair of the Retirement Committee Gayle Olsen (Region 18), Legislative Advocate Iván Carrillo, Cheryl Lynn de Werff (Region 4), ACSA leader and former ACSA president Alice Petrossian (Region 15), Senior Director of Federal Advocacy Adonai Mack, Linda Hutcherson (Region 6) and Moohay Choe (Region 16). Right: The delegation poses outside the U.S. Supreme Court. losses of earned retirement income. As California is currently experiencing a sig- nificant teacher shortage, this policy affects the state’s ability to recruit teachers into second careers from other professions as well as other states and creates an impedi- ment to people who might otherwise want to become public-school teachers. “I strongly recommend that other ACSA committees and/or other groups make a trip to speak on the inequity of California’s antiquated law of WEP and GPO,” said ACSA delegate Choe. “The issue that educators’ salaries and pensions in California make daily life a challenge impedes on the recruitment and maintain- ing highly qualified teachers/administrators to stay in the education field.” The WEP also disproportionately impacts low-income workers. Many teach- ers earn Social Security coverage because of part-time jobs they had during their SAVE THE DATE! june 23-29 Principals’ Summer Institute. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . UCLA 24-28 Institute for New & Aspiring Principals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . UCLA august 16-17 16-17 23-24 23-24 23-24 30-31 Special Education Academy (Start Date) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . El Monte Special Education Academy (Start Date) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Redwood City C & I Leaders Academy (Start Date) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Monrovia C & I Leaders Academy (Start Date) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rancho Cordova Special Education Academy (Start Date) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bakersfield Special Education Academy (Start Date) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sacramento september 6-7 6-7 6-7 13-14 13-14 13-14 13-14 13-14 13-14 13-14 13-14 C & I Leaders Academy (Start Date) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Salinas English Learner Academy (Start Date). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Covina Superintendents Academy (Start Date) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sacramento C & I Leaders Academy (Start Date) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Costa Mesa Equity Administrators Academy (Start Date). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Fairfield Personnel Administrators Academy (Start Date). . . . . . . . . . . Burlingame Personnel Administrators Academy (Start Date). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Irvine Principals Academy (Start Date). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bakersfield School Business Academy (Start Date) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sacramento School Business Academy (Start Date) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . San Bernardino Special Education Academy (Start Date) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Riverside SEPTEMBER 25-27, 2019 | ISLAND HOTEL | HUNTINGTON BEACH