EDA Journal Vol 12. No.1 Autumn 2019 | Page 27

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT QUARTERLY common factor in visitation to Hue stems from the intention to participate in a cultural experience. But, how to expand on that experience and activate ‘place’ involves a better understanding our who are the visitors to Hue. According to (Nguyen and Chang 2014), visitation to Hue has expanded from 8000 arrivals in 1990 to 1.5 million in 2010. Rofe et al. (2017), state Hue received 1.2M visitors in 2014 with the majority of international tourists from Europe and the Asia pacific region with cultural heritage the primary draw card. However, with the majority of visitors on packaged tours the length of stay of two days remains relatively unchanged. McKercher (cited in Nguyen and Chang 2014) poses a model in which cultural tourism is divided into five classifications in which the packaged sightseeing tour is most likely to have a superficial and entertainment orientated experience. Whereas, the serendipitous cultural tourist is more likely to have a more immersed experience. transformation and recovery from a war-ravaged landscape, it is the combination of these elements that form what is the unique identity and local character. Therefore, it is challenging to balance the conflicting interests of stakeholders and their interpretation of ‘local character’. In a comparison with the work undertaken by Dovey, Woodcock & Wood (2009) on Fitzroy in Melbourne Australia, the success of Hue as a tourist attraction exacerbates the tensions between stakeholders. On one hand, UNESCO’s requirement of preservation can be restrictive in terms of renovation and renewal, whereas, the other extreme is unchecked development. As an example, the construction of illegal dwellings on the rampart walls has lead to forced resident relocation. Another more visual example in the gentrification in areas where traditional housing is being lost to more glamourous townhouse developments. Whilst gentrification can be a signal of success in desirability of ‘place’, it is often at the loss of local identity. It is the latter that provides more opportunity for tourism development, specifically for extending lengths of stay and supporting the proposed UNESCO model of Sustainable tourism development (UNESCO 2014). It is this model that proposes local community engagement to empower and engage in site conservation, supported by findings of work undertaken by Group 2 in 2017 (Economic, development, tourism and heritage) that indicated anecdotal support for the tourism industry by the local community, especially if it helped to beautify the citadel and improve infrastructure for walking. Also, Ngo Quang Duc & Phan Thuy Van (2017, p.79) state ‘…it is important to rebuild the general landscape environment so that the lakes in the Capital City are not only water reservoirs but also green, clean and beautiful parks with cultural and historical significance for the people to enjoy. The challenge for developing the tourism market is to understand who is visiting and to collate better data for market development. Our Australian group whilst posing models of walking tours were witness to group after group arriving in buses or on cyclo tours leading me to think we need to be flexible on our thinking of how people would undertake a Citadel Trail. THE LOCAL EXPERIENCE AND RETAINING LOCAL IDENTITY. Hue has a complex history of imperial rule, colonisation, regional influences, political Traditional home within the Citadel Preserved roofline of the old town Hoi an Traditional home undergoing renovation with height increase New townhouse development within the Citadel Source: Author Development controls exist within the Management Plan of the Complex of Hue Monuments (Thua Thein Hue Provincial People’s Committee 2015) in regard to setbacks and building heights, however does it need to preserve all of the citadel housing VOL.12 NO.1 2019 | 27