ecology EcologyofEverydayLife | Page 79

75 THE NATURE OF SOCIAL DESIRE not, in all our doing, lose sight of its purpose, which is, after all, to make the world a more human dwelling place.”9 Baldwin displayed a unique ability to seamlessly integrate hemes of creativity and empathy within he political project, elaborating a new sensual-political sensibility hat was to unfold throughout he course of he decade. A focus on the qualitative dimensions of social transformation can also be found in the writings of Murray Bookchin. Whereas an explicit anarchism in the U.S. had been eclipsed by socialist movements of he pre-war period, anarchist thought was reintroduced in Bookchin’s canonical work, Post-Scarcity Anarchism .10 Written during the late sixties, the essays in Post-Scarcity heralded the potential for what Bookchin called a “social libido,” a radical integration of reason and passion that he hoped would be fulfilled within the new social movements. While Bookchin emphasized the need to overcome material necessity, he also asserted the importance of expanding the revolutionary horizon to encompass qualitative concerns as well: ... the revolution can no longer be imprisoned in the realm of Need. It can no longer be satisfied merely with the prose of political economy. The task of the Marxian critique has been completed and must be transcended. The subject has entered the revolutionary project with entirely new demands for experience, for re-integration, for fulfillment, for the merveilleux [marvelous]}1 What we see in Bookchin’s early writings is an attention to the qualitative and subjective dimensions of he revolution, dimensions that could not be accounted for by Marxist-based theories that dissolved the individual into essentialist categories of history of society. As Bookchin states so passionately, “A revolution that fails to achieve a liberation of daily life is counterrevolution. The self must always be identifiable in the revolution, not overwhelmed by it.”12 For Bookchin, questions of desire and need constitute a complementary matrix through which to reconstruct society as a whole: while countering the fabricated scarcity of the post-war period by constructing social and political counter-institutions (institutions and practices such as decentralized participatory democracy, municipal economics, and ecological technologies), revolutionaries must infuse these new cooperative and decentralized structures with creativity and sensuality—a vitality hat he recognized within he “social libido” of he new social movements. During he same period, in Europe, a similar sensibility emerged, culminating in the May 1968 revolt in Paris. In 1957, inspired by earlier aesthetic movements such as he Symbolist, Dadaist, and Surrealist movements, a group of avant-garde artists and. writers from across Europe formed the Situationists International (SI). While situationist writer Guy Debord called for