ecology EcologyofEverydayLife | Page 60

THE ECOFEMINIST DESIRE FOR NATURE 55 feminist and social ecological theory, she articulated in turn, the need for a feminist dimension to the theory of social ecology: The perspective that self-consciously attempts to integrate both biological and social aspects of the relationship between human beings and their environment is known as social ecology,. .while this analysis is useful, social ecology without feminism is incomplete. Feminism grounds this critique of domination by identifying the prototype of other forms of domination: that of man over woman.23 In this way, Ring drew out the feminist implications of social ecology, exploring new ways of examining the relationship between systems of male domination and ecological crises in general from a perspective informed by social anarchism. Although feminists such as those in the WITCH collective were drawing similar connections between oppressions almost a decade earlier, Ring made the articulations between forms of social hierarchy explicit, demonstrating their relationship to ecological injustice. Ring’s grounding in anarchist theory and social ecology allowed her to avoid many of the epistemological traps into which feminists fell during those years. Through a social ecological critique of hierarchy, she recognized the need to abolish aE forms of oppression, while emphasizing as weE, the potential for political collaboration between women of different class, race, and ethnic backgrounds. Ring’s key role in establishing WomanEarth, as well her participation in international feminist forums such as the United Nations Conference on Women in Nairobi in 1985, reflect her epistemological sensitivity to questions of difference as well as her anarchistic appreciation of the need to simultaneously fight against aE forms of hierarchy and oppression. Ring’s ecofeminism did more than just recognize the importance of making connections between different forms of social and ecological injustice: It recognized the importance of making connections between different women aE over the world to counter these interconnected crises. Repeatedly in her writings, Ring expressed the need to create face-to-face dialogue between women, both intemationaUy and cross-culturaUy within the United States, to create unified anti-radst strategies to address women’s diverse struggles for sodal and ecological justice. EcofEMiNisM, EnvIronmentaIJustIce, AncI International EnvIronmentaIIsm To fully appredate die historical distinctiveness of Ring’s partidpation in multicultural and anti-radst projects such as WomanEarth, we must locate it within a larger history of both the feminist and ecology movements of the mid-1980s. As a mostly white feminist movement was being chaEenged regarding problems of racism and essentiaHsm, the ecology movement was confronted on its exclusion of die concerns and partidpation of communities