EBL Newsletter EBL_Newsletter_Winter_2019_WEB | Page 20

Australians with life-threatening swallowing condition win NDIS battle Exclusive: Disability insurance The plan would have costed $40 prevalence of dysphagia among them agency ruled wrong to deny funding a day but the agency argued varied, it was substantial. to man with dysphagia as a result of thickening fluids his dietician had cerebral palsy requested – which helped the Thousands of Australians living with a life-threatening swallowing condition could now get NDIS funding after the National Disability Insurance Agency man swallow safely and “gave him independence and confidence” – Gingold put the number of people impacted by the decision “in the thousands”. were health-related, not a disability The NDIA could appeal the decision support. to the federal court but that risked setting a more significant precedent. (NDIA) lost a high-stakes case at the The tribunal has previously accepted administrative appeals tribunal. the agency’s interpretation of A NDIA spokeswoman said: “The the law – that it did not need to Agency is considering the recent fund supports considered the decision in [the applicant] and the responsibility of another government National Disability Insurance Agency service provider. (NDIA).” swallowing supports, which are vital “Whether or not the other Late last year, Guardian Australia for people living with dysphagia. That government agency actually reported the case of Tanisha would end a long-running battle in provided that support was Flemming, who had been denied which the NDIA claimed the supports considered largely irrelevant,” funding as the NDIA and states should be offered by the states. Gingold told Guardian Australia. argued over who should pay for the “But in this watershed judgment, supports. [the deputy president] … said that in In January, the federal government the past the tribunal and the NDIA said it would fund some supports for have both misinterpreted that section people with dysphagia as an interim of the legislation.” measure, following a campaign by responsibilities, experts said. A win for advocates the Council for Intellectual Disability. “This judgement has the potential Darren O’Donovan, an administrative “This ruling should effectively make to drastically change what the NDIS law expert at La Trobe University, the interim funding agreement on funds,” said Sara Gingold of Disability said the decision was a “powerful swallowing therapies permanent,” Services Consulting. “It will impact vindication of those advocates fought said Justine O’Neill, the CID the way the scheme interacts with such a long battle to correct agency chief executive. “It is a positive all other areas of government, from policy in this area”. development for many other NDIS Experts and advocates have described the decision as a “watershed”, arguing the agency would now be forced to fund But the ruling may also have broader implications for people with disabilities, and for the agency’s finances, as it threatens to overhaul what is considered state and NDIS education to health to justice and everything in between.” “Swallowing and dietary support is an integral part of people’s social participants who need ongoing health related therapies to be funded by the NDIS to enable them to maintain While it is unclear exactly how and family lives,” he told Guardian many people might be impacted Australia. “It is not just preventing by the decision, there are about a person from choking (or other 100,000 people who have dysphagia medical events), it enables the person O’Donovan said the judgment throughout Australia. People would to step out confidently into the underlined the need for “federal and need to be aware of the ruling in world.” state politicians to commit to clearer order to make use of it in dealings with the NDIA, advocates argued. Piers Gooding, a disability law expert at Melbourne University, said the social interaction, quality of life and independence.” rules and improved governance for the scheme”. In a rebuke to the NDIA, the AAT issue had not been “examined in the Source: www.theguardian.com/ deputy president, Brian Rayment, Federal Court so this decision sets an australia-news/2019/jun/14/ ruled the agency was wrong to deny important precedent”. australians-with-life-threatening- funding to a 34-year-old man who had dysphagia as a result of cerebral palsy. 20 EBL QUARTERLY NEWSLETTER He noted about 34,000 people had cerebral palsy in Australia. While the swallowing-condition-win-ndis- battle