EB5 Investors Magazine Volume 1 Issue 1 | Page 53

David began practicing law in South Africa in 1970 before immigrating to the United States with his wife and two young children, where he took the California bar in 1979. David has been active in EB-5 since its inception in 1990 and was in the U.S. Senate meeting where the EB-5 legislation was proposed and debated by Senators Kennedy and Biden. He subsequently filed one of the first EB-5 cases in history by meeting with the client in Taiwan and teaching the consular office about the new law. Today, his firm represents high-networth clients, including Fortune 500 companies and mid and small cap companies, startups, actors, performers, athletes, engineers and pharmacists seeking visas and green cards. His own practice concentrates on EB-5 cases of all types, assisted by his EB-5 team of about 20 people. Given his history and expertise, we wanted to ask David a few questions to get an expert’s insight into the EB-5 Program. EB5 Investors Magazine Staff: We would like to ask you about recent challenges facing the EB-5 Program, especially the recent Chicago case. David Hirson: It is an unfortunate situation where, according to the allegations, the people behind the program made serious misrepresentations. USCIS works very closely with the SEC, and as a result, SEC froze all the accounts of the business, as well as those of the individuals. STAFF: How do you think this will affect the program overall? DAVID: It has already had a chilling effect on some of the investors as they no longer have the same level of confidence in the system. They should have confidence because there are very good programs that have great track records, and even some new ones which are very, very strong, and it will be a matter of time before confidence in a country like China is restored to prospective investors. However, investors have not stopped investing under the program. They are just asking more questions. EIM: Where do you see the program being in five years? DH: I see it expanding, thriving, reaching the quota, and succeeding in getting Congress to increase the 10,000 quota number sometime in the near future STAFF: Can you please address the potential cap on Chinese visas? DAVID: The EB-5 visa category allocates 10,000 visas in each government fiscal year, commencing Oct. 1 and ending on Sept. 30. Of these 10,000 visas available, no single country may get more than seven percent of the total visas. As a result of the low numbers from other countries, the U.S. Department of State has allocated almost 6,000 visas to Chinese nationals. Please bear in mind that each qualified family member, in addition to the principal investor, takes up one visa. fiscal year ending on Sept. 30, 2013. This warning was subsequently revised so that it is unlikely that China will reach the cap in the 2013 fiscal year. However, DOS predicts that China will probably reach its cap in the 2014 fiscal year. This could mean, in a worst-case scenario, that 700 visas will be available to China. I am of the opinion that given the history of the allocation of visa numbers, this is an extremely unlikely outcome. Therefore, an estimate is that China will be able to receive approximately 6,000 visas in 2014. This figure will increase if the number of visas from other countries remains low. STAFF: What are the biggest challenges facing investors? DAVID: Some of the biggest challenges facing investors include: • Proving the lawful source of funds • Concern as to the sustainability and viability of the project so that the conditional residence can be converted into permanent residence • Ensuring that the project completes what is shown in the Business Plan • Taxation of the worldwide income of green card holders • The amount of time the investor and/or the investor’s family must remain in the United States to preserve the residence status and not be deemed to have abandoned this status. This issue is usually alleviated by obtaining a re-entry permit for a two year validity period, allowing the investor and/or the investor’s family to remain outside of the United States for up to two years. STAFF: