EB5 Investors Magazine English Edition Volume 6, Issue 2 | Page 49

TOP CORPORATE AT TORNEYS RIKARD LUNDBERG BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK, LLP | SHAREHOLDER Rikard Lundberg represents private and public companies from various industries such as recreation, hospitality, media, alternative energy, gaming and consumer products in a broad range of matters and transactions, including public and private securities offerings (equity and debt), EB-5 transactions, mergers and acquisitions, corporate contracting and general commercial and corporate matters. Lundberg has represented regional centers, developers and service providers in EB-5 transactions and has a wealth of experience counseling clients on the corporate and securities law aspects of EB-5 transactions and leading successful teams in drafting and negotiating the complex and voluminous documents that drive an EB-5 transaction. WHAT TRENDS ARE YOU SEEING IN THE EB-5 INDUSTRY? The continued uncertainty about EB-5 program reform is having a chilling effect on businesses and markets. Expected integrity measures, together with the SEC’s continued enforcement efforts and private litigation, have led industry participants to focus on compliance matters. Furthermore, there is increasing focus on use of third-party service providers in project due diligence and oversight. Market-wise, increasing visa wait times for Chinese-born investors has lowered demand, forcing EB-5 projects to seek capital in less developed emerging markets, resulting in increased competition for fewer investors, longer capital raising time and smaller project sizes. HOW ARE YOU HANDLING THE ISSUE OF REDEPLOYMENT? In new transactions, I craft the relevant organizational documents and investor disclosures to provide authority for the investment entity to redeploy funds and hire an investment adviser, if necessary. I also consider interplay with other investment terms, such as investor distributions and return of capital. In existing transactions, I review relevant documents and disclosures made at the time of the original investment to determine whether the investment entity has authority to redeploy and on what terms. If there is no such authority, it may be necessary to obtain investor consent before redeploying. JENNIFER MOSELEY BURR & FORMAN LLP | PARTNER Jennifer Moseley is a corporate and securities par tner at Burr & Forman LLP in Atlanta, and advises small startups to large public companies in an array of transactions and capital-raising activities. She enjoys resolving her clients’ needs in her role as counselor to startup and developmental stage companies. Moseley was introduced to EB-5 in early 2008 and addressed securities law implications in EB-5 during the early years, when securities law was not at the forefront of EB-5-related discussions. She continues to help clients navigate the intricacies of securities laws with practical solutions to meet their goals. WHAT TRENDS ARE YOU SEEING IN THE EB-5 INDUSTRY? With backlogs on visa processing and proposed legislative changes, I continue to see direct EB-5 investments becoming more popular, particularly with investments moving toward a wider variety of projects outside of big real estate developments. In addition, due to increasing negative views of EB-5, I think there will be more inter- agency cooperation and emphasis on oversight, particularly from the SEC, in the reforms. Finally, as EB-5 investors become savvier of the intricacies of EB-5 requirements, investors’ and regional centers’ attention will turn toward more complex issues such as individual tax consequences, and service providers in this area will increase. HOW ARE YOU HANDLING THE ISSUE OF REDEPLOYMENT? I have discussions upfront with the JCE about other projects into which we could redirect EB-5 funds in case an investment will be repaid before an EB-5 investor has had his or her I-829 petition adjudicated, and more migration agents are requesting this upfront. Funds can be redeployed to a project of a different developer, but typically I negotiate with the JCE to provide contractual obligations allowing the regional center to redirect funds to a future project of the same JCE. When the JCE has a proven track record, investors have a higher level of comfort in redeployment. EB5INVESTORS.COM 49