Dynamite - Alliance Catholic Worker Newsletter Spring 2015 | Page 4

Catholicism And Drone Warfare “We are witnessing a certain proliferation of this technology and a growing use of it in various conflicts. The challenges are multiple and related to international humanitarian law, to human rights, and to international law. The ethical implications are not insignificant. The choice of indifference in relation to this question is counter-productive. The fact of not addressing problems at the right moment can have disastrous consequences and make them almost insoluble, as experience in other domains teaches us” (Archbishop Silvano Tomasi raised the issue of the misuse of armed drones to the UN in Geneva)   We  live  in  an  age  where  technology  is  rapidly  advancing  all  around  us.  Often  it  is  hard  to  see  the  moral   repercussions  this  advancement  will  pose  until  it  is  too  late.  It  is  easy  to  get  behind  and  support  the  biggest   and  best  advances  while  forgetting  that  every  piece  of  technology  has  its  good  and  its  bad  effects.  Drones   were  sold  to  the  American  people  on  a  very  appealing  platter.  Ideas  like  saving  American  lives  my  remotely   taking  out  targets  with  no  need  for  men  on  the  ground,  has  signi?icantly  drove  down  the  risk  of  waging  a  war   on  terror.  The  secret  war  that  drones  wage  has  been  going  on  for  nearly  ?ifteen  years  now,  and  many   Catholics  are  still  unaware  of  where  the  church  stands  on  the  use  of  such  war  machines.         We  Americans  can  often  fall  victim  to  the  idea  that  “Uncle  Sam  knows  best”.  As  Archbishop  Tomasi   reminds  us  in  his  2014  UN  speech;  “indifference  in  relation  to  this  question  is  counter-­‐productive.”  We   Christians  are  held  to  the  command  to  “love  our  enemy”  and  “do  good  to  those  who  hate  us”.  In  the  modern   age  this  demands  that  we  be  in  constant  critique  of  what  our  government  is  supposedly  doing  on  our  behalf.     It  is  dif?icult  to  get  exact  data  on  drone  strikes  because  most  of  the  time  the  government  never  admits   that  a  drone  strike  ever  happened  in  the  ?irst  place.  According  to  The  Bureau  of  Investigative  Journalism,   there  have  been  413  drone  strikes  in  Pakistan  alone  since  2004.  It  is  estimated  that  between  2,438-­‐3,943   people  lost  their  lives  in  these  strikes.  Reports  also  estimate  that  416-­‐959  of  those  killed  may  have  been   civilians  with  no  af?iliation  to  any  terror  group.  Due  to  the  fact  that  the  military  de?ines  all  men  of  military  age   killed  in  strikes  as  “militants,”  the  number  of  innocent  victims  may  actually  be  higher  than  reported.  Even   with  statistics  it  is  dif?icult  to  grasp  the  reality  of  drone  warfare.  As  Bishop  Richard  Pates  a  Chairmen  of  the   USCCB’s  Committee  on  International  Justice  and  Peace  states:  “There’s  something  about  the  detached  nature   of  a  drone  strike  that  feels  cleaner  than,  say,  unilaterally  invading  a  sovereign  nation.”       Catholics  who  believe  in  the  just  war  tradition  of  the  church,  should  be  against  the  use  of  drones  like   those  who  believe  in  the  Paci?ist  traditions  of  the  church.  According  to  the  just  war  doctrine  of  the  church,  an   act  of  war  like  a  drone  strike  must  fall  under  four  very  strict  conditions  to  be  considered  just  defense.  1.The   threat  of  the  enemy  must  be  imminent.  2.all  other  means  of  resolution  must  be  spent.  3.there  must  be  serious   prospects  of  success.  4.the  use  of  arms  must  not  produce  evil.  The  argument  can  be  made  that  our  current   policies  in  the  use  of  drone  warfare  does  not  ?it  any  of  these  four  points  the  church  lays  out.  The  pentagon   currently  has  the  policy  that  drones  can  be  used  even  if  there  is  no  imminent  threat.  Often  drones  are  used  as   a  ?irst  resort  and  many  attacks  are  launched  with  out  suf?iciently  identifying  the  target.  They  also  instill  a  fear   in  local  people  which  maybe  as  evil  as  the  terror  drones  are  supposed  to  be  combatting.     Is  it  be  a  surprise  that  a  church  that  teaches  against  war  and  the  death  penalty  is  against  a  tool  that   silently  executes  suspected  terrorist  targets  without  a  trial.  The  church  has  always  held  ?irm  to  its  mission  of   hope  for  the  poorest  of  the  poor  and  its  pleas  for  the  most  basic  human  rights  for  all  people.  Current   technology  is  moving  to  develop  a  drone  that  is  fully  automated  and  takes  out  targets  without  a  human  pilot.   Technology  can  be  a  wonderful  thing  but  it  is  easy  to  abuse.     -­‐By  Daniel  Schmidt