Drum Magazine Issue 4 | Page 20

18 Drum: ENTERPRISE It’s the validation sticker we’ve worn for years to explain (or excuse) our interests. When people ask, “What are you studying?” our answer has always been two-fold. First, the program (History, Theatre) and then the plan: “But I’m going to law school.” How quickly the confusion (American Studies?) gives way to ‘Ahas’ of comprehension. Of course, now that the day is upon us we must appraise the master plan. The most fickle among us English vocabulary is a side effect not an objective of legal education. Consider, Harvard Law School ‘Secondyear Basic Courses’1 are: Accounting, Constitutional Law, Corporations and Taxation. If two or more seem tedious, perhaps law’s not for you. Or perhaps it’s the money that piques your interest, as it did mine; frankly, as it does mine. $100,000 would relieve my proud mother of my myriad loans in a matter of months. But those six-figure salaries “Going to law school with no interest in legal practice is much like fulfilling all the pre-med requirements without any inclination to become a doctor.” (myself included) seek solace in the Apply and Defer Approach. Gifted scholars, dancers, teachers, poets — we know we don’t want to be lawyers. But in the name of appeasing parents, perceptions, and Pell Grants, we log onto LSAC (Law School Admission Council). A word. If you: a) Are going to law school because you aren’t going to medical school, b) Are going to law school because “it just comes next,” or c) Imagine law school as an extension of your liberal arts education, please do reconsider. Going to law school with no interest in legal practice is much like fulfilling all the pre-med requirements without any inclination to become a doctor. Unless you truly adore maths and science, you’d have worked too hard for too little. No less than organic chemistry, civil procedure is too dense to be done as an option-opening exercise. Misguided are we who envision a PoliSci playground for polymath and public servant alike. Like an amplified version of vocational training law-school is designed to prepare professionals for their practice. The refinement of an are awarded primarily to starting associates in Corporate Law. If you are opposed on principle to the professional manipulation of money, your Benz will be a long time coming. So it goes for those who seek reprieve in financial services. We (especially the ‘we’ with debt) have grown weary in The Struggle. When everyone else was doing it, being broke seemed enlightened. But the recession has rubbed all the rugged charm off structural unemployment. As the debts add up and our twenties wind down, temporary tedium seems worth the tender. But I wonder. What is the difference between the investment banker and the twenty-first century sharecropper? Instead of other men’s land, he tills other men’s money. He rises at the crack of dawn and works to the point of exhaustion, planting and growing the ‘crop’ of those richer than him. At the end of the season, he gives the landowner (not to mention the landlady) the bulk of the harvest, keeping a minute fraction for himself. It doesn’t seem right. I understand that there are those of you whose motives transcend the money. Some of you find the thrill of the trade as appealing as the pay-cheque. Others find inspiration in the financing of dreams,»