Drink and Drugs News DDNNovember2004 | Page 5

p04-05 News.qxd 29/10/04 8:01 pm Page 5 News | FDAP conference – no more excuses Service to ‘difficult’ clients blocked by blame culture Young people a ‘priority’ Young people are a priority for the government, home office minister Caroline Flint told delegates: ‘It was right to reclassify cannabis. It’s now important to focus on heroin, cocaine and crack.’ There was a real difference between those who try cannabis as a rite of passage, and those children for whom substance misuse becom- es something to blot out their lives, she said. ‘We need to bear this in mind when producing services and materials.’ The National Drug Strategy must meet the needs of the whole comm- unity, Ms Flint emphasised. Having an equal opportunities policy did not necessarily represent engagement. Organisations on the ground must ‘change to practical actions that work,’ she said. Many of the government’s prior- ities had been targeted on deprived areas – ‘but are we getting the out- comes we need to see?’ she asked. Mental illness, particularly among Afro Caribbean communities, was overlooked. ‘How do we make sure that people who present themselves with depression or illness are being reached?’ Ms Flint challenged. Women could be similarly hard to reach, particularly is they were involv- ed in prostitution, or worried about their children being taken off them. A useful guide to promoting services was to think about what currently keeps different groups away and find better ways of commun- ication, she suggested. Partnership working and user groups were a practical way of targeting services. ‘We cannot take academic tomes and fine words and say we’ve cracked it,’ she said. ‘Delivery is in many of your hands – in making it work, making it a reality.’ ‘It was right to reclassify cannabis. It’s now important to focus on heroin, cocaine and crack.’ Responsiveness crucial to next stages of reform More responsiveness is crucial to reshaping services – which is the crucial next stage of public service reform, according to Peter Martin, Chief Executive of Addaction. ‘Getting it wrong in our field costs lives. We have to become more responsive,’ he said. Flourishing communities were the holy grail – but many people weren’t part of communities, he pointed out. ‘The state must make sure the least powerful and most in need get help.’ Hard to reach communities required great commitment to conquer the experiences of stigma of which many users complained. ‘I have come across outrageous arrogance… sometimes it doesn’t take much to make the www.drinkanddrugs.net atmosphere more welcoming,’ said Mr Martin. Agencies had a duty to make services more accessible – by having flexible opening hours, smarter commissioning and working with other agencies. One-stop shops and mobile needle exchanges were ‘reflections of a can-do approach’, giving practical help where they were needed. Hard to reach groups had notoriously low expectations, as they were used to looking down, not up, Mr Martin said. It was up to everyone involved in treatment to provide a welcoming service, he urged. ‘We do need to get our own house in order. We have a moral duty of access to all.’ Getting services to hard to reach groups will be much more effec- tive if we address the blame culture that exists, according to Darren Garrett, development manager at the Alliance. ‘We tend to talk in terms of a “difficult client” and complain that we just can’t get them to come to us,’ he said. This led to a cycle of ‘chaotic bureaucracy’, as clients became ‘hard to reach, hear, attract – and please.’ The key to reaching diverse groups was to ensure that you are accepted by the client and work on their terms. Notions of shame and stigma often got in the way of people accessing the services they needed and it was vital to educate communities to ensure knee-jerk reactions didn’t prosper. ‘One-size fits all services are not appropriate. If clients are not given what they need, they come away with even bigger habits,’ he warned. There was no panacea, but treatment options were essential. ‘Most users think that services won’t be sympathetic to their needs,’ said Mr Garrett. The challenge was ensuring you had the abil- ity and wherewithal to retain users, and this meant being flexible to people’s different circumstances and working hours. ‘How inclusive are chemist schemes if they are not open to suit?’ he pointed out. Building trusting relation- ships was essential to getting people involved with drug services. There was often anx- iety about working with young people, relating to child protec- tion issues. Women users with children were often punished by society, for deviating from their role as carer. It was important to understand the prejudices these groups faced, to communicate effectively. Above all, it was vital to make sure services were something users wanted to be involved in, he said. No such thing as ‘hard to reach’ groups ‘There’s no such thing as hard to reach groups – only hard to reach services,’ Victor Adebowale, Chief Executive at Turning Point, told Conference. Hard to reach was ‘one of things that people invent as an excuse’, he said. Substance misuse masked a range of complex needs. Often there were mental health problems – the challenge for substance misuse was to find its place alongside other services. Concentration on services for opiate users often meant lack of targeted provision for other drug users – including black and minority ethnic (BME) communities. Particular patterns of drug use (such as khat) in these communities was very poorly understood, said Mr Adebowale. This was out of synch with a growing black population in many parts of the country. Research from Turning Point showed that people from these communities were not presenting for treatment. Services tended to focus on single problems, instead of looking at the whole picture of unemployment, family demands and immigration status. One-stop advice should include training and education. ‘The cost of not reaching hard to reach groups will come back on us tenfold,’ Mr Adebowale warned. Those with greatest need were likely to cost the taxpayer more in the long run. 1 November 2004 | drinkanddrugsnews | 5