Donald Marshall. Illuminati Exposed. 6 | Page 131

Polygraph tests will help to demonstrate the reality of REM driven human cloning
DM: Furthermore, polygraph tests, independent unbiased lie-detector tests, of low level Illuminati members who retain their REM driven cloning experiences when they wake up from sleep, will unequivocally prove to sceptics about the reality of the Illuminati’ s REM driven human cloning subculture. I will volunteer to be polygraph tested and after I have passed, I will point the way to members of my family, who have told me when we were activated as REM driven clones at the cloning center, that if they are ever confronted with a lie detector test regarding the Illuminati’ s REM driven human cloning subculture... they will decline the polygraph test and just say“ REM driven human cloning is true”. My family members do not want to dig themselves deeper by lying on a polygraph test. May 20, 2012 at 5:48am ·
3SG4: Polygraph tests have an approximate 60- 90 % accuracy rate. That is why polygraph tests are used on day time TV shows and not in courtrooms.
DM: No 3SG4. The accuracy of polygraph tests has improved in recent years and there is a much higher accuracy percentage, currently( Truth or Lie c. 2016). Research this 3SG4. May 20, 2012 at 5:53am
DM: Furthermore, 3SG4, in Canadian courts, polygraph tests are admissible when it involves the sexual exploitation of a child... research this statement and get back to me... * smiling * May 20, 2012 at 5:55am
[ In general, polygraph evidence is NOT admissible in“ Canadian Criminal Courts”( Mack’ s Criminal Law 2016). However, EXCEPTIONS where polygraph evidence is admissible occurs in“ Canadian Civil Courts”( which is different from“ Canadian Criminal Courts”) whereby the admissibility of polygraph evidence varies from province to province in“ Canadian Civil Courts”( Mack’ s Criminal Law 2016). In the family and child protection context, trial decisions on polygraph evidence are inconsistent.“ Few appellate courts [‘ appeals courts’ or‘ courts of appeals’] have ruled directly on the use of polygraph evidence in family law cases. With this caveat in mind, generally, [ Canadian ] courts have been concluding that: evidence of willingness to take a polygraph test is relevant and admissible but no firm conclusions may be drawn from a refusal to take a polygraph.”( Department of Justice Canada 2016) Furthermore, judges( in Canada), are more receptive to the receipt of polygraph evidence in family and child protection cases than in criminal cases( Department of Justice Canada 2016). The reader should seek the sources Mack’ s Criminal Law( 2016) and Department of Justice Canada( 2016) under section“ 9.10 Polygraph Evidence” for further details on the admissibility of polygraph evidence in Canadian courts. Moreover, with regards to Donald Marshall’ s above statements: yes, polygraph evidence is admissible in“ Canadian Civil Courts” and in( some) family and child protection cases( depending on the context)]
131 | P a g e