Habeas Corpus
Habeas Corpus is “[A] writ [formal document] requiring a person under arrest to be
brought before a judge or into court, especially to secure the person's release unless
lawful grounds are shown for their detention” (Legal-dictionary 2015).
During the Bush Presidency [2001-2009 (History 2015)], President Bush signed
executive orders giving him sole authority to impose martial law, and suspend Habeas
Corpus. This gives him doctorial power over the people without any ‘checks and
balances.’
In other words, “The government can jail you for life without charges, without a trial,
without a lawyer” (Russo 2006).
Furthermore: “The National Defense Authorization Act [4] signed by President
Obama on the 31st December 2011 authorises the indefinite detention, without trial or
indictment, of any US citizens designated as enemies by the executive. ” See Paye
(2013) for further discussion regarding the suspension of Habeas Corpus.
Fraudulent Manipulation of Election Results
In 2004, at the “Forum of Presidential Election”, Clinton Eugene Curtis, a former
Computer Programmer for NASA and ExxonMobil testified under oath that election
results can be rigged using electronic programs.
In 2004, he gave the following abridged testimony (Russo 2006):
Judge: Mr Curtis, are there programs which can be used to secretly fix elections?
Curtis: Yes.
Judge: How do you know that to be the case?
Curtis: Because in October of 2000 I wrote a prototype for present Congressman
Tom Feeney, and the company I worked for in Oviedo Florida –it did just that.
Judge: And when you said, “it did just that” –it would rig an election?
Curtis: It would flip the vote 51:49 –whoever you wanted it to go to, and whichever
race you wanted to win.
Judge: And would that program that you designed be something that election officials
that might be on county boards would actually, could detect?
Curtis: They’d never see it.
Judge: So how would such a program, a secret program that, fixes the election –how
could it be detected?
Curtis: You would have to view it either with source code, or you would have to
have a receipt and then count the hard paper against the actual vote total –other than
that you won’t see it.
Judge: Given the availability of such vote rigging software and the testimony that has
been given under oath of substantial statistical anomalies and gross differences –
between exit polling data and the actual tab ulated results, do you have an opinion
whether or not Ohio elections, the Ohio Presidential elections was hacked?
Curtis: Yes. I would say it was.
15 | P a g e