Doing Business 2020
Mexico
Getting Credit
This topic explores two sets of issues—the strength of credit reporting systems and the effectiveness of collateral and bankruptcy laws in facilitating lending. The most
recent round of data collection for the project was completed in May 2019. See the methodology for more information .
What the indicators measure
Strength of legal rights index (0–12)
• Rights of borrowers and lenders through collateral laws (0-10)
• Protection of secured creditors’ rights through bankruptcy laws
(0-2)
Depth of credit information index (0–8)
• Scope and accessibility of credit information distributed by
credit bureaus and credit registries (0-8)
Credit bureau coverage (% of adults)
• Number of individuals and firms listed in largest credit bureau
as a percentage of adult population
Credit registry coverage (% of adults)
• Number of individuals and firms listed in credit registry as a
percentage of adult population
Case study assumptions
Doing Business assesses the sharing of credit information and the legal rights of borrowers and
lenders with respect to secured transactions through 2 sets of indicators. The depth of credit
information index measures rules and practices affecting the coverage, scope and accessibility of
credit information available through a credit registry or a credit bureau. The strength of legal rights
index measures the degree to which collateral and bankruptcy laws protect the rights of borrowers
and lenders and thus facilitate lending. For each economy it is first determined whether a unitary
secured transactions system exists. Then two case scenarios, case A and case B, are used to
determine how a nonpossessory security interest is created, publicized and enforced according to
the law. Special emphasis is given to how the collateral registry operates (if registration of security
interests is possible). The case scenarios involve a secured borrower, company ABC, and a
secured lender, BizBank.
In some economies the legal framework for secured transactions will allow only case A or case B
(not both) to apply. Both cases examine the same set of legal provisions relating to the use of
movable collateral.
Several assumptions about the secured borrower (ABC) and lender (BizBank) are used:
- ABC is a domestic limited liability company (or its legal equivalent).
- ABC has up to 50 employees.
- ABC has its headquarters and only base of operations in the economy’s largest business city. For
11 economies the data are also collected for the second largest business city.
- Both ABC and BizBank are 100% domestically owned.
The case scenarios also involve assumptions. In case A, as collateral for the loan, ABC grants
BizBank a nonpossessory security interest in one category of movable assets, for example, its
machinery or its inventory. ABC wants to keep both possession and ownership of the collateral. In
economies where the law does not allow nonpossessory security interests in movable property,
ABC and BizBank use a fiduciary transfer-of-title arrangement (or a similar substitute for
nonpossessory security interests).
In case B, ABC grants BizBank a business charge, enterprise charge, floating charge or any
charge that gives BizBank a security interest over ABC’s combined movable assets (or as much of
ABC’s movable assets as possible). ABC keeps ownership and possession of the assets.
Page 56