Diplomatist Special Report Argentina | Page 12

of relations between developed and developing countries, and the “hypothesis of the deterioration of the terms of trade” with regard to the evolution of relative prices between primary and industrialized products. In terms of public policy recommendations, substitutive industrialization of imports was favored, as well as the economic integration of the countries of the region, in order to gain production scale and effi ciency. The economic rise of great Asian countries such as China and India has led to a noticeable change in the global economic and fi nancial axis. Formerly located in the North Atlantic, with a few cases of rapid growth and development in Asia (Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, Singapore), commercial and fi nancial exchange has doubled its focal points incorporating the North Pacifi c and the Eastern Indian Ocean. This global geo-economic change has generated a renewed bias in the economies of Latin America, including Argentina, towards the deepening of its inter-industry trading patterns, based mainly on the export of raw materials and manufactured products with a high factorial content of natural resources (CEPAL, 2013). While it is conceivable that countries with an abundance of natural resources can follow more complex production and trade patterns -such as the United States, Canada or Australia- and reach high levels of economic and social development, the fact is that in the past this has been the exception rather than the rule in Latin America (Massot et al., 2015). Argentina-India merchandise exchange is one of the best examples of patterns based on the exchange of very diff erent kind of goods. Table 1 shows the Argentine case with some partner exchange of merchandises in 2015. It can be seen that Argentine exports to Asian countries are concentrated in a Table 1. Exchange of merchandise concentration by chapters. Argentina 2015. Chapter at 80% India Exports Imports 1 13 China 2 9 ASEAN 2 10 Japan 6 5 EU 9 11 Russia 5 2 SA 4 8 US 16 9 Brazil 12 11 Chile 19 15 Average 7,6 9,3 General / Total 17 14 Source: Own elaboration based on Secretariat of Commerce Database of Argentina. 12 few trade chapters, in particular, oilseeds and vegetable oil. In the case of India, only one chapter concentrates more than 80% of exports. Grubel-Lloyd Index is shown in Table 2. It can be seen that Argentina has an interindustrial pattern of trade with the vast majority of its trade partners, including India. Argentine exports are basically natural resource-based, meanwhile, imports are the industrial manufacturer. Table 2. Grubel-Lloyd Index. Argentina 2015 Country Partner India Grubel-Lloyd Index 0,049 China 0,029 ASEAN 0.048 Japan 0,053 EU 0,135 Russia 0,022 SA 0,174 US 0,293 Brazil 0,590 Chile 0,280 Average 0,167 General / Total 0,333 Source: Own elaboration based on Secretariat of Commerce Database of Argentina. In 2017, for instance, more than 90% of the Argentine exports to India are vegetable oils; in addition, more than 50% of Argentine vegetable oil is destined to India, and around 50% of Indian imports of soybean oil are from Argentina. Argentine imports from India are more diversifi ed; despite the vast majority are manufactured goods. However, other features of the Argentine exchange with Asian countries emerge from current fi gures. In spite of the global merchandise balance with Asia is negative, Argentina has a surplus with some countries. Trade surplus and defi cits with Asia are shown in Table 3. First, the Argentine defi cit with Asia is determined by defi cit with China (81%). Second, Argentine has a relevant surplus with some Asian countries, like Vietnam and India. Finally, the merchandise defi cit with China is larger than the total trade surplus with Asian countries with a negative balance with Argentina. Regarding those facts, and based on the Argentine economic history, some questions emerge about the future of the bilateral relations. Challenging the past and the facts The international economic changes stemmed from the undoubted growth of Asian economies has raised a series of questions about the development of some Latin American countries that have achieved a relatively complex and articulated industrial structure, such as Argentina.