DigiTech Magazine - UK CIO2020 - Spring 2015 | Page 13
...................................................................................................................................................................................... TRAVELSPORTGAMES
DEVELOPMENT RISKS REMOVED:
1. Less risk from incorrectly specified requirements
In summary, we believe that:
2. Changing requirements are absorbed throughout the
lifecycle
By default IT should be ‘built to change’ not ‘built to
last’. IT change needs to be delivered in small frequent
increments and Professionalising IT in this way means
we reduces business risk.
3. Design issues are uncovered early
4. Business engagement is far easier
5. Simple deployments as often as possible
6. Functionality released as business change demands
The sourcing/contracting of development and
operations needs to change. We are seeing lots of
different models emerging. The thing I think most
people are agreeing on is that the in-house capability
needs to improve and where we do contract for
services we need to stop trying outsource risk, it has
to be shared.
OPERATIONAL RISKS REMOVED:
1. Everything is automated and recorded
2. Nothing is built by hand during deployment
3. Everyone does the process every week, they know it well
4. Simple changes create smaller failures and take less
time to undo
Perception
The fastest approach to find the ‘faster gear’ required
is create
a digital function and master this in one
20%
Business
‘end-to-end’ value stream first. Business, operations
and development
have to be one team and we need
IT
to address the whole lifecycle from Procurement to
Deployment.
of change
The biggest
challenge however is the culture and silos
80% down the
between teams. The Agile movement is breaking
wall between the Business and Development areas, DevOps
is breaking down the wall between Dev and Ops. Now we
are seeing DevOps becoming DevOpsSec as organisations
Change to keep
Change to meet the
add Security people to the product
teams. We are seeing
the lights on
business need
quite a few organisations insourcing Dev and Ops function
at this point to
remove
Keeping
the organisational boundaries
Change and
to keep pace
with the basics
contracts from lights
the on product development teams.
For more information speak to Ben:
At North Highland we’ve run some really successful
[email protected]
collaboration workshops to break down theses barriers
30% a
20%
20%
30% thing is to create
IT Effort
and overall we’ve
found the critical
culture of trust across these areas of expertise.
THE DIGITAL AGENDA
Traditional
If we take a look at the below diagram and reflect on the
Iterative then sweat
fact that we’ve Iterative
had twenty years of a ‘refresh
as long as possible’ culture with our IT. We need to think
that if we are going to switch from ‘Build to last’ to ‘Build to
change’ then transformational change is required at each
Traditional
vertex. If its not done in unison, the leading vertex
is held
Traditional
TIME
back by the trailing one. TIME
Iterative
TIME
Brains of IT in-house
Agile development
Build to change
IT FUNCTION
Professional Dev Ops
Ongoing management
Continuous change
Tolerate risk
Simpler & shorter
Low entry cost
Build to change
Speed
Co-operation
PROCUREMENT
SUPPLIERS
Agile development
Continuous competition
Open technologies
CIO Magazine Spring 2015 Issue
13