Digital Continent Winter 2019 | Page 30

the sacrament of Holy Orders, the issue of a reformed or renewed diaconate was mentioned. But what form should this renewed diaconate take? In the words of the Bishop of Ostuni, “I desire the function of the subdeacon and deacon, diligently collected from the writings of the fathers and decrees of the councils, to be restored and put to use, especially the functions of deacons. The Church has always used their services, not only in ministering at the altar, but in baptism, in care of hospitals, of widows, and of suffering persons. Finally, all the needs and concerns of the people are mediated to the bishop by deacons.” 33 In his remarks, the bishop points out the sacramentality of the diaconate. Not only was the role of the early deacon to care for widows and the infirmed, but also to minister at altar, baptism and the care of the suffering, perhaps a reference to anointing of the sick. The same bishop would also recommend a longer interval of diaconate service before priestly ordination, which could be seen as a temporary “permanent” diaconate. Others agreed in various degrees with a restoration of the order. 34 The discussion was not one sided, certainly there were voices in opposition to the restoration of a permanent diaconate or even an expanded diaconate. Indeed, there were voices which inferred, “the devil induces the legislation of those things which destroy the priesthood under pretext, that a deacon should preach and other things of this kind.” 35 Many believed that the diaconate was just a part of the process which led to the priesthood. Discussion continued; notable Jesuit scholar Alfonso Salmero would contend that, “the diaconate was instituted not for service of profane tables but for ministry at the altar…not instituted for ministry of profane tables but heavenly” 36 Discussion would lead to consideration of a statement by the council in July of 1563. 33 Echlin. The Deacon in the Church: Past and Future, 100. Ibid. 35 Ditewig. Emerging Diaconate, 85. 36 Echlin. The Deacon in the Church: Past and Future, 101. 34 22