discipline summaries
messages with her . Dr . Tadros would regularly administer botox / fillers to Patient A after they finished having sexual intercourse and oral sex . Patient A did not pay Dr . Tadros money for these injections . Dr . Tadros failed to cooperate with the College investigation related to Patient A including :
• Dr . Tadros repeatedly failed to produce Patient A ’ s chart despite repeated requests .
• Ultimately , Dr . Tadros provided a falsified chart ( indicating that the money Patient A had paid for botox / fillers was for cosmetics she purchased at the clinic ) in order to mislead the College and support his false assertion that Patient A was never his patient .
• Dr . Tadros provided information to the College knowing it was false including that Patient A only bought cosmetic products from his assistant , that he did not treat Patient A , that he could not transcribe her chart because it was written by his cosmetician , and in response to requests from the College for Patient A ’ s original chart ( rather than a photocopy ), Dr . Tadros said that he could not find Patient A ’ s original chart , that it must have been misplaced , and reiterated that Patient A had purchased products .
• Dr . Tadros also had his staff provide information to the College that he knew to be false in order to mislead the College in its investigation of Patient A ’ s complaint . Dr . Tadros threatened Patient A and pressured her into sending an email and a letter to the College investigator stating that Dr . Tadros was not her physician at any time , and requesting , in the email that her complaint be withdrawn .
PATIent B Patient B became a patient of Dr . Tadros ’ in 1989 , along with her children and husband . Dr . Tadros treated Patient B for various medical issues and ailments between 1989 and 2012 , including anxiety and depression . A few years after Patient B became Dr . Tadros ’ patient , Dr . Tadros began to compliment Patient B , and mentioned that he might be able to offer her a job in his office as a secretary . On one of Patient B ’ s appointments with Dr . Tadros , he told her that she seemed down , and asked her to come back to his office that evening when he would have more time to spend with her to discuss her feeling down . On a subsequent after-hours visit to his office , Dr . Tadros initiated sexual contact with Patient B and had sexual intercourse with her in his office . The sexual relationship between Dr . Tadros and Patient B continued for many years , mostly at his office after hours , while Dr . Tadros continued to provide regular care and treatment to Patient B , her husband and their children . Patient B ’ s husband found out about Dr . Tadros ’ sexual relationship with Patient B when he overheard Dr . Tadros and Patient B on the phone . Dr . Tadros denied the relationship when Patient B ’ s husband confronted him . In his response to the College , Dr . Tadros denied having a sexual relationship with Patient B while she was his patient . He told the College , among other things , that he had a relationship with Patient B prior to her becoming his patient , that Patient B had tried to harass him into restarting the relationship , that Patient B and her husband were “ creating an issue to discredit ” him . Dr . Tadros provided this information to the College knowing it was false , in order to try to discredit Patient B and her husband and to mislead the College in its investigation . Dr . Tadros ’ assistant wrote a letter to the College which stated that Patient B told her that her relationship with Dr . Tadros started and ended before Patient B became his patient , and that although Patient B wished to re-start the relationship , Dr . Tadros “ totally refused .” Dr . Tadros provided this information to the College knowing that it was false , in order to mislead the College in its investigation . During its investigation , the College requested that Dr . Tadros transcribe his medical record for Patient B , as it was illegible . The transcription omitted many entries in Patient B ’ s medical record .
PATIent C From 1997 until 2014 , Dr . Tadros was Patient C ’ s family physician and that of her children . Dr . Tadros also occasionally provided care to Patient C ’ s husband . Dr . Tadros treated Patient C for anxiety , panic attacks and depression as well as various other medical issues .
In approximately 2006 , Dr . Tadros suggested that Patient C come to his office at the end of the day for
64
Dialogue Issue 2 , 2016