Dialogue Volume 12 Issue 2 2016 | Page 53

discipline summaries breasts. Patient A was shocked that her breasts were exposed without warning. Dr. Patel was rough in his examination, and asked her repeatedly where the fibroids were. Patient A repeated that she was being followed by Hospital 1 for that issue. After Dr. Patel examined her breasts, he examined Patient A’s stomach and recent surgical stitches. He then left the examination room. The College obtained an independent opinion from Dr. X on the care provided to Patient A. As found by Dr. X, Dr. Patel’s care did not meet the standard of practice of the profession. The history and other information in the chart obtained were contradictory. Patient A was subjected to unnecessary investigations, and did not have her concerns regarding her presenting complaint addressed. She had a breast examination to which she had not consented. There were errors in judgment in not seeking to obtain information from Hospital 1 or ordering appropriate tests, and there was a lack of adequate supervision of the staff member who saw Patient A before Dr. Patel. Dr. Patel’s care displayed a lack of knowledge and judgment. Dr. Patel failed to provide an audit trail for Patient A’s electronic medical record that accorded with College policy upon request by the College investigator. Patient B Patient B attended at the office of Dr. Patel, his family physician, in August 2012 complaining of chest pain. Patient B was initially seen by a member of Dr. Patel’s staff, who recorded his history and vital signs, and performed an electrocardiogram. Dr. Patel subsequently entered the examination room and reviewed the information obtained by his staff. Dr. Patel informed Patient B that his electrocardiogram was normal, and that Dr. Patel could not treat him. Patient B continued to express concern about his pain, and Dr. Patel advised him that he could go to a hospital emergency department if he wished. Dr. Patel did not insist that Patient B attend an emergency department, although the last entry in the encounter note states ‘advise to go to ER.’ No diagnosis was stated in the chart. The next day, Patient B was admitted to hospital, where he underwent triple bypass surgery. In September 2012, Patient B was discharged from hospital with instructions to follow up with his family physician. In September 2012, Patient B attended Dr. Patel’s clinic. However, after Patient B voiced concerns regarding post-operative care, he was discharged from Dr. Patel’s practice by letter to Patient B, which was five days after the patient’s discharge from hospital. The letter stated “you are hereby advised to get a new family