Dialogue Volume 12 Issue 2 2016 | Page 35

practice partner Why re-thinking more is better Campaign to help doctors engage in conversations about unnecessary tests paying off BY STUART FOXMAN photo: istockphoto.com S am and Paula present with abdominal pain. Their doctors take the histories and do physical exams, each ruling out the worst. Sam’s doctor says not to worry but to follow up if anything changes. The other doctor discovers that Paula is terribly anxious and insistent on an ultrasound, so relents. Dr. Andrew Quinn gets it. As a family physician in Tweed, he understands the time pressures of the day. “It’s just easier to get someone out the door. You can tell from a brief interview or exam that nothing serious is going on, but you don’t have 30 minutes to explain so you do a requisition for the test.” It may seem harmless or expedient, but Dr. Quinn describes it another way: “That’s just bad medicine.” He was among the speakers at the inaugural national meeting of Choosing Wisely Canada (www.choosingwiselycanada.org), held recently in Toronto. Close to 300 people attended, including clinical leaders, representatives of physician specialty societies, medical students and residents, and patient representatives. CWC is a campaign to help physicians and patients engage in conversations about unnecessary tests, treatments and proce- dures. The goal is to make smart and effective choices to ensure high-quality care. All provincial and territorial medical associations have endorsed the CWC campaign, and in fact this College references the campaign in the new CPD section of our website and in our newly designed peer assessment handbooks. A range of Canadian national specialty societies, representing a broad spectrum of clinicians, are also participating. They’ve developed lists of commonly-used approaches that aren’t supported by evidence and should be questioned. The recent meeting shared how organizations and jurisdictions are implementing and scaling CWC recommendations. As CWC notes, unnecessary tests and treatments don’t add value to care. To the contrary; they detract from care by potentially exposing patients to harm, leading to more tests to investigate false positives and contributing to patient stress. Moreover, this all strains the resources of the health system