Dialogue Volume 12 Issue 2 2016 | Page 10

feature nuity of care issues more broadly. cess to his whole history. Mr. Price experiWhile we have explored developing polienced delays in receiving important tests, cies addressing this issue in the past, in the difficulties contacting the treating physilast 10 years there have been significant cians, confusion regarding how to book changes that align well with efforts to imappointments and inadequate communicaprove continuity of care. For example, the tions from physicians regarding appointintroduction of more family health teams ments and test results.” and group practices has had a positive imThe report went on to state that over pact on after-hours and weekend coverage. and above the breaks in the continuity of But problems do persist. We do, for Mr. Price’s care, there were missed opexample, continue to receive calls about portunities to expedite it. Even once it one aspect of continuity of care – patients’ was understood he likely had cancer with inability to contact physicians, both during serious complications, it still took nearly the day and after hours. Many practices antwo months to complete the diagnostic swer their phones during limited weekday tests he required, refer him to a specialist, hours and very few allow patients to leave and operate. (Please see the sidebar for a messages. Some practices description of the breaks in provide comprehensive after his continuity of care). Mr. Price regularly contacted his In the last 10 years hours care, but some provide none at all, continuing physicians and “had assumed there have been to refer patients to the ER. a great deal of responsibility significant changes Pharmacists also often contact in trying to manage his own continuity of care,” stated the that align well with us to report that they have difficulty reaching physicians report’s authors. efforts to improve to clarify prescriptions. Among the 13 recomcontinuity of care Given the current landscape mendations in the HQCA and the Alberta experience, report, five were directed at we’re taking another look at the College of Physicians and this issue. But we need you to help – by Surgeons of Alberta (CPSA). Most notably, telling us what the problems are and helpthe study recommended that the CPSA ing us to identify potential solutions. actively monitor compliance with its After Over the next several months, we will Hours Access to Care Standard (since rebe engaging doctors, the public and other named Continuity of Care) which requires stakeholders in a discussion about continuphysicians to ensure patients have access to ity of care issues in order to help shape the continuous care and prohibits directing padevelopment of a new policy. This work is tients to the ER unless a formal agreement happening in concert with a review of the with the ER is in place. existing Test Results Management policy, Notably, the Colleges in British Columas this comprises a critical aspect of conbia, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island and tinuity of care. To kick off these projects, the Yukon also set expectations or provide we’re currently hosting two discussions guidance for physicians relating to contionline to get your feedback on continuity nuity of care issues, including after-hours of care issues more generally, and specificoverage. cally relating to our current Test Results While this college does have policies that Management policy (please see www.cpso. touch on continuity of care issues, such as on.ca). Going forward we’re exploring the Test Results Management policy, it additional opportunities to engage with does not have any policy focused on conticontinued on page 12... 10 Dialogue Issue 2, 2016 Issue2_16.indd 10 2016-06-16 12:26 PM