Dialogue Volume 11 Issue 4 2015 | Page 31

TRAnsparency Removal of information from public register F photo: D.W. Dorken rom time to time, physicians request that the Registrar exercise his discretion to remove information about them from the public register. At its recent meeting, Council considered the principles for use by the Registrar in exercising his discretion to remove information. The Registrar has the ability to refuse to disclose to an individual or refuse to post on the College’s website information that is available to the public if the Registrar has ‘reasonable grounds to believe that this information is obsolete and no longer relevant to the member’s suitability to practice’. The statutory discretion lies with the Registrar under a provision of the Health Professions Procedural Code. Given the increased categories of information now available on the public register as a result of the Transparency Initiative, there may be an increase in requests from physicians to have information about them removed. The principles now indicate that physicians wait at least two years from the date of the decision to make an application for removal. As well, physicians are advised to wait at least six months between applications. This approach reflects the view that a certain amount of time must pass to meet the Code’s requirement that information is obsolete and no longer relevant. Examples of some of the factors that the Registrar may consider in exercising discretion include: • How recent is the information? • Does the information have continued relevance? • What is the seriousness/severity of the information? • Does the information serve to enhance protection of the public? The updated principles that will guide these decisions are published on the website at www.cpso.on.ca. Issue 4, 2015 Dialogue Issue4_15.indd 31 31 2015-12-16 9:36 AM