Dialogue Volume 11 Issue 4 2015 | Page 12

feature Dr. Jan Ahuja conducts assessments of physicians who work in walk-in clinics. By sharing their collective expertise and experience, our peer assessors are helping create assessment tools tailored to their respective discipline 12 Over the past several years, the College has averaged more than 1,700 peer assessments a year, carried out across more than 30 disciplines. Historically, less than 15% of randomly-selected assessments require ongoing follow-up by the College’s Quality Assurance Committee. There are already wellestablished processes in place to address the practice deficiencies of this smaller group of doctors who don’t receive satisfactory outcomes. The Peer Assessment Redesign’s intent is to focus on the majority of doctors by providing a more educational, quality improvementfocused experience. So far, hundreds of peer assessors, including Dr. Ahuja, have participated in the redesign. By sharing their collective expertise and experience, our peer assessors are helping create assessment tools tailored to their respective discipline to establish a consistent, high bar of quality that exemplifies best practices. While not intended to replace other standards of care within their discipline, defining quality within the context of peer assessment assures that assessors provide physicians with more relevant and consistent feedback. As the majority of practices have no significant gaps identified, this feedback can assist the physician to improve their practice from “good” to “better”. Twelve disciplines are expected to begin using the new procedures and tools for peer assessments in 2016; the first disciplines/specialities seeing the change will be Walk-In Clinic, Hospitalists, Dermatology, and GP-Psychotherapy. Before the new peer assessment tools and procedures are implemented, physicians within each discipline will have an opportunity to provide feedback on how quality care is defined and evaluated within their practice area. “Having practising physicians review and provide input on assessment tools is an important element supporting the acceptability and validity of the peer assessment program,” said Mr. Dan Faulkner, Deputy Registrar. Providing feedback can also be used for earning continuing professional development credits. Physicians will be asked to provide feedback on the prospective peer assessment tools through an online questionnaire. Input on the definitions of quality care used in future peer assessments is also being sought from the speciality organizations. “Most physicians have told us that their peer assessment experience was very collegial and informative,” says Mr. Hillier. “We hope they’ll find peer assessments in the future to be even more beneficial with relevant and useful feedback to help them provide the best care possible for their patients.” Implementation of the new assessment procedures will happen progressively over time, on a discipline by discipline basis. Physicians can gain more information on what is involved in the peer assessment process by visiting: www.cpso.on.ca/CPSO-Members/ Peer-Assessment. Dialogue Issue 4, 2015 Issue4_15.indd 12 2015-12-16 9:35 AM