Dialogue Volume 11 Issue 3 2015 | Seite 44

more effective discharge and community follow-up for these complex care patients in order to identify and treat the root causes of illness before a severe event occurs,” stated PSRC’s review. Enhanced communication strategies between emergency departments and primary care providers may help to identify the need for elective assessment of patients, including those whose management is complicated by obesity. The difficulty in finding a hospital to take the patient also prompted the PSRC to recommend that access to urgent care for patients with morbid obesity should be coordinated and facilitated. “Although not specifically stated as a reason for declining to accept the patient at all of the hospitals contacted, it would appear that the patient’s morbid obesity contributed to the difficulty in finding an appropriate bed,” stated the PSRC’s report. “Given the increasing segment of the population who are within the obesity BMI classification, it is important to address how our health system is resourced and structured to ensure timely access to urgent/emergent care for this population group. More specifi- 44 Dialogue Issue 3, 2015 cally, CritiCall should review their process for accessing specialized beds for surgical care of obese patients. It may be possible to have a listing of hospitals that are available for this population and they should be the first ones called to help streamline the communications/calls to those more likely to have the necessary beds and equipment available,” said the PSRC. CritiCall had contacted at least four hospitals before finding one that could accommodate the patient. The PSRC also recommended that the hospital review its transfer of care policies and procedures for patients awaiting transfer. The transfer of care, in this case, had not been completed between Physician A and Physician B because Physician A had secured the transfer and assumed that this would take place shortly after his shift ended. The lack of transfer of care may have impacted the communication and the understanding of the patient status for Physician B who came on shift after the transfer had already been secured. “The patient’s condition, as well as information regarding the urgency, mode and reason for the transfer should be communicated to the attending physician if the admitting/transferring physician is not on site. It must be clear at all times who is the Most Responsible Physician for the patient,” the review stated. Besides having a history of recurrent leg cellulitis and chronic constipation, the patient also visited the hospital often for urinary tract infections. He was taking lactulose and PEG 3350 and self-administering enemas. His medical history was remarkable for non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus, ethanol use, recreational prescription drug use, tobacco and marijuana smoking. After the patient arrived at the emergency department of Hospital A reporting abdominal pain and vomiting, plain radiographs (three views of the abdomen) were requested and films were reviewed by the radiologist. No previous x-rays were found.