Dialogue Volume 11 Issue 2 2015 | Page 70

discipline summaries orders. Patients have the right to expect that members of the medical profession will behave with professional integrity toward them; this underpins the trust that patients have in their physicians. Such conduct reflects poorly on Dr. Martin, and it affects the reputation of the profession as a whole. Dr. Martin also admitted that counselling for eating disorders was outside his scope of practice, which is an additional failure to meet his professional responsibilities. The two-month suspension, the reprimand, and the indefinite prohibition against Dr. Martin returning to fertility medicine, all serve to denounce Dr. Martin’s misconduct. They also tell both Dr. Martin and the profession as a whole that this misconduct was serious and will not be treated lightly by the profession. Thus the proposed penalty serves the goals of specific and general deterrence. It also serves to maintain public confidence in the profession. The requirement that Dr. Martin must undertake remedial education in medical ethics will serve a rehabilitative function. Dr. Martin’s record-keeping practices were substandard as noted by both of the experts who reviewed the patient records. This is also unacceptable and requires specific remediation. The proposed penalty requires that Dr. Martin complete a medical record-keeping course, which is appropriate under the circumstances. Patient safety is further addressed in the Order by the indefinite limitation of Dr. Martin’s future practice exclusively to reproductive endocrinology. This is a narrow area in which Dr. Martin has expertise, and where the Committee had no evidence to suggest a failure to maintain professional standards. Interpretation of fertility-related ultrasound images will cease as of December 31, 2014, and while Dr. Martin will be permitted to continue interpreting images until then (after his suspension is served), he will be supervised by a clinical supervisor. The Committee was satisfied that this program of oversight will adequately protect the public during the short time that Dr. Martin continues to interpret these images. Furthermore, for an indefinite period Dr. Martin will be required to submit to unannounced inspections of his practice location(s) and patient records by the College for the purpose of monitoring his compliance with the Order. This will also serve to protect the public. Costs in the amount of $40,140 payable within 30 days of the Order have been agreed to by the parties. 70 Dialogue Issue 2, 2015 The Committee considered this to be an appropriate case in which to order costs. The Committee agreed that a significant proportion of the costs of the hearing should be borne by Dr. Martin and not the membership as a whole. The hearing was booked for a number of weeks and settled on the first day of the hearing. In conclusion, the Committee considered the proposed penalty carefully. It agreed with counsel for the parties that it represents an appropriate sanction in this matter, and it accepted the joint submission. Order The Discipline Committee ordered and directed that: 1.  r. Martin appear before the panel to be reprimanded. D 2.  he Registrar suspend Dr. Martin’s certificate of regist tration for a period of two months; 3.  he Registrar impose the following terms, condit tions and limitations on Dr. Martin’s certificate of registration: a)  ffective immediately, Dr. Martin shall cease E accepting new patients in his practice of fertility medicine; b)  ffective immediately, Dr. Martin shall not counE sel or advise patients regarding eating disorders or any other matter falling outside his permitted scope of practice; c)  ffective July 1, 2014, Dr. Martin shall restrict his E practice exclusively to reproductive endocrinology and the interpretation of fertility-related ultrasound images; d)  ithout in any way restricting the generality of the W restriction set out in paragraph 3(c) above, effective July 1, 2014, Dr. Martin shall be prohibited from practising fertility medicine in any respect, including, without limitation, the following: i.  ertility-related assessment and investigations, F including the performance or interpretation of fertility-related hysterosalpingograms, fertility treatment or fertility-related cycle-monitoring; ii. Artificial insemination; iii. In vitro fertilization including oocyte retrievals and/or embryo transfers; iv.   Counselling or advising patients regarding fertility treatments, artificial insemination, or any other matter relating to fertility medicine; and v.   ecision making of any kind regarding the care D and treatment of patients undergoing fertility