Dialogue Volume 11 Issue 2 2015 | Page 65

discipline summaries Minority Opinion of the Committee Two members of the Committee agreed with the allegation of disgraceful, dishonourable or unprofessional conduct but disagreed with the majority on the issue of oral sex and sexual intercourse. Appeal Summary On April 4, 2014, Dr. Gale appealed the decision of the Discipline Committee to the Superior Court of Justice (Divisional Court).On March 25, 2015, the Divisional Court dismissed Dr. Gale’s appeal. Full decisions are available online at www.cpso.on.ca. Select Doctor Search and enter the doctor’s name. DR. ALEXANDER MILTON HAINES Practice Location: Barrie Practice Area: General Practice Hearing Information: Agreed Statement of Facts, Admission, Joint Submission on Penalty On July 25, 2014, the Discipline Committee found that Dr. Haines committed an act of professional misconduct, in that he failed to maintain the standard of practice of the profession in his care and treatment of 16 patients. Dr. Haines admitted to the allegation. The College began an investigation into Dr. Haines’ practice following the receipt of information from the Office of the Chief Coroner for Ontario regarding the death of one of his patients. The cause of the patient’s death was determined to be Oxycodone toxicity. As part of its investigation, the College retained a medical inspector, Dr. X, who reviewed the charts of 25 of Dr. Haines’ patients. The patients whose charts were reviewed had all been treated with pain control medications for chronic pain due to various causes and clinical backgrounds. Dr. X noted that Dr. Haines’ charts were generally clear to read, organized and reflected genuine concern by Dr. Haines for his patients. Nonetheless, Dr. X opined that certain concerning issues recurred a number of times in Dr. Haines’ practice. The areas of concern identified by Dr. X were as follows: •  r. Haines had ongoing prescriptions for opiates and D benzodiazepi